Der Silberjunge: Opening the Borders Was Against German Law — And it Was Planned in Advance

Posted on by

Thorsten Schulte is a German economist and financial expert who runs a website known as Silberjunge (Silverboy).

In the following exposé of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s machinations during (and before) the “refugee” crisis, Silberjunge focuses on two major points:

1.The chancellor’s opening of the borders to uncontrolled migration without a directive from the Interior Ministry was a clear violation of German law.
2.The entire migration wave should not even be called a “crisis”, since it was planned in advance.

Mr. Schulte provides ample documentation for his assertions. The links are shown in the video, and may be found on his website.

One of the most prominent German cultural traits is a deep-seated respect for the law and an insistence on obeying the rules. It’s a characteristic that has its negative aspects (“I was only following orders”), but it can also be a positive force for cultural reform and regeneration.

According to Silberjunge, all the politicians in Berlin are well aware of the facts he presents in his video, but are afraid to discuss them in public. His presentation is an appeal to them to break the wall of silence and expose the chancellor’s manifold derelictions of duty in such a way that ordinary German citizens can see them.

If the German people ever become aware of the lawless outrages that have been perpetrated against them — and that’s a big “if” — it may cause such a widespread popular revulsion that the current politically correct/multicultural establishment will be overthrown.

Many thanks to Nash Montana for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Stunning expose of Merkel'sl law breaking

Watch this video on YouTube.

Transcript:

0:00With this video we want make a contribution,
0:03to open the eyes of as many people in Germany as possible,
0:06and we especially want to highlight the connections
0:09and background which have led to this migration wave.
0:20With this video we want to break through the cartel of silence in Berlin,
0:23and we’re not going to cook up party-favoring soups.
0:26I want to say here that I have sat in the office of the secretary general
0:29of the CDU, and I expect that after this video I certainly
0:32will not be allowed to go back. We want to present facts
0:35instead of the practical in this time, and at the end of this video
0:38we want to make an appeal to the representatives of the CDU.
0:41and let’s just listen for now to what Angela Merkel said a few years ago
0:44concerning the party donation scandal when Helmut Kohl
0:47refused to disclose the names of the people involved in the scandal:
0:50”To make a promise is an important thing!
0:55I am not even going present this lightly.
0:58But to make a promise of something that
1:02at the same time will break the law if that promise is kept,
1:05that is something that we as the party who stand for —
1:08and have always defended — this nation of laws will not tolerate!”
1:14We just heard from Angela Merkel that apparently the CDU is the party
1:17of the Rule of Law. Let’s listen now to something that a journalist
1:20from the Springer House said about the world
1:23on December 16 at “Tough but Fair”:
1:26”and when we then saw these […] at the main train station in Budapest
1:29she […] acted and Angela Merkel had put
1:32morality before law and I think this is very problematic.”
1:35Again: Angela Merkel put morality before Law.
1:38Therefore we have to ask is it acceptable for a head of state
1:41to decide what is moral and what is immoral?
1:44Can a head of state then say that her vision of
1:47what morality is has more worth, and therefore
1:50that laws can be broken, or is this the way
1:53to a reign of despotism? But let’s continue
1:56with serious sources. SPIEGEL published an article
1:59on August 1st, 2016, under the telling title
2:02”Security breach at the chancellor’s office”,
2:05in which it reported the following:
2:08”One after another they lodged complaints in Berlin, in order to pressure for better security at the border: The chief of the Constitution protection office Hans Georg Maasen, the chief of the Federal police Dieter Romann, and even the chief of the Federal intelligence service Gerhard Schindler.”
2:17In the article it is even mentioned that the chief
2:20of the Federal police had it confirmed in writing that he was ordered to remain passive,
2:23so that later on he couldn’t be accused of breach of duty.
2:26Isn’t it amazing? These are facts, it’s factual.
2:29One has to try and imagine this for once just what exactly went on there.
2:32In the meantime we now know that the concerns back then
2:35have been absolutely confirmed by many events in the present.
2:38But that’s not all. We want to pay attention to another article
2:41that was printed in the Frankfurt Allgemeine, and this is the point —
2:44we will present you with a link at the end of this —
2:47where you can read everything for yourself in peace,
2:50and where you also will find all the source links for what I present here.
2:53In the article it is reported that there exists
2:56no directive to open the borders
2:59from the Ministry of the Interior through today.
3:02But — according to the article — without this directive
3:05from the Ministry of the Interior, it is clearly illegal
3:08to let people into the country without any border control.
3:11The FAZ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) wrote:
3:14”It’s been heard from the ranks of the Union Fraction that there was a massive political pressure being put on the representatives of the Coalition Fraction so that they would refrain to direct any propositions concerning this matter towards the Federal Government; such propositions, it was furthermore signaled, would in regards to this matter not be addressed with an answer anyway.”
3:30Ladies and Gentlemen, we have had this confirmed by our Berlin sources,
3:33and I ask you: is this not just an absolutely outrageous
3:36process of events we’re talking about here?
3:39Apparently massive pressure was put on coalition representatives,
3:42and I am telling you that up until today there have been no specific requests
3:45in the German parliament regarding the matter we are talking about here.
3:48In the comments section of “Beck’scher Online”, which is prestigious
3:51among experts, it says that — and I am quoting literally —
3:54”Whether the federal ministry (of the interior) indeed had enacted such a directive at the end of August / beginning of September 2015 remains in the dark through today. Even the scientific services in the Federal Parliament are puzzled…”
3:59(The “scientific services for the Federal parliament” are an institution which allow each individual federal representative to gather non-partisan information to any topic in the parliament through these services)
4:05I will repeat this one more time: Even the scientific services
4:08within the Federal Parliament are puzzled.
4:11Ladies and gentlemen, the leadership of the Grand Coalition knows about all that, and I know what
4:14I am talking about, because we have discussed this with federal representatives.
4:17The Coalition leadership knows it, the Ministry of the Interior knows it,
4:20the political leadership in Berlin knows it in its entirety.
4:23But a wall of silence has been built,
4:26things are concealed, glossed over and covered up.
4:29Dear Angela Merkel, the most hurtful truth is the one we wish to conceal.
4:32We are asking, we demand that the representatives
4:35of the CDU and CSU, especially the Interior politicians,
4:38who we know that are fully aware
4:41of all the facts and circumstances, we demand that they finally fight for the law,
4:44that they file for inquiries, and that hopefully this way,
4:47will put pressure on the federal government
4:50so that they finally will have to own up to the truth.
4:53We cannot let this wall of silence exist any longer.
4:56Now let me at this point — and I find it well fitting —
4:59let me cite a quote from Bertholt Brecht:
5:02”He who fights might lose. He who won’t fight has already lost.”
5:05This is about our rights, about our laws; this is about
5:08the requirement for our government to adhere to law and order, and therefore,
5:11dear representatives of the CDU and the CSU, please fight for upholding our laws.
5:14And to those who think that these migration problems are now
5:17over and done with because we made this pact with Erdogan,
5:20and the Balkan Route was closed,
5:23I will tell you that about six months
5:26after the federal election of September 2017,
5:29there will come another, brand new migration wave.
5:32There is more of what it is about at the link below;
5:35I will merely mention two keywords to you:
5:38family reunification. and I will add something for you which
5:41most people don’t even know, but within the concept
5:44of family reunification only one person is counted as a migrant
5:47or a refugee, which means that if three or four come here,
5:50only one will be counted in the official refugee statistics,
5:53but more on that in the links. Again, do not believe
5:56that this is over. The federal government has shrewdly
5:59set the date for family reunification for refugees,
6:02for instance from Syria, to be not until after the federal election.
6:05If you are now of the opinion that this is inhumane,
6:08that it is unmerciful and socially cold, I also want to
6:11help people in need, but we’re going to blend in an article from
6:14the FAZ in which our foreign aid minister, our federal minister, expressed what it would look
6:18like if we helped locally: Müller was speaking about supporting measures in Syria and neighboring
6:21countries: “Each euro spent there will have 30 times the impact of what we can achieve
6:24here in our country.” One million spent there would correspond to 30 million here.
6:27The Neue Zürcher Zeitung at one time spoke of five times as much.
6:30We don’t want to argue, it is abundantly clear that we could
6:33achieve much much more locally on-site with the horrendous amount of money
6:36that we are spending here.
6:39This has nothing to do with demanding an inhumane act.
6:42Our government looked the other way back near the end
6:45of 2014, the beginning of 2015, when a massive cutback took place within
6:48the world nutrition program of the United Nations.
6:51We show you a link here as an example of a report
6:54about drastic cutbacks in Lebanon, and we also show you
6:57a report from Elmar Brok.
7:00Elmar Brok is regarded as one of the most reputable CDU/CSU personalities
7:03in the European Parliament in Brussels,
7:06and this man has himself concluded that a drastic cutback
7:09of almost 40% has taken place. The European representative Elmar Brok (CDU) “The migration wave from the Middle East started two and a half months ago to this extent because for instance the food supply was cut back by 40% and because there was no more money available.”
7:15The fact that this is said by someone who was active on-site and locally
7:18for a long time shows that the information
7:21that I have is correct, namely that per month,
7:24per refugee, $32 was spent in the past and
7:27that this was cut back to $9,
7:30that food rations were dramatically cut back.
7:33Those vouchers in Lebanon therefore were
7:36dramatically cut back, and everybody looked the other way.
7:39Dear Elmar, why are you complaining about this today?
7:42And you now say that with this action the motives for migration
7:45were reinforced. Why did the Merkel government —
7:48who were fully aware of that, for instance with a situational assessment
7:51of the Federal Intelligence Service as we have learned —
7:54why did the Merkel government remain inactive?
7:57I am speechless about many things, but there is one point especially:
8:00Our government also looked away when our allies,
8:03at the head the USA, with Qatar, and Saudi Arabia,
8:06made the butchery in the Syrian
8:09civil war completely possible.
8:12On October 2, 2015, on page 2 of the
8:15Frankfurter Allgemeine, an article was published
8:18in which the background of the Syrian war was illuminated.
8:21It said that the CIA with a secret budget of $1 billion,
8:24According to the New York Times, “How many Syrians exactly were trained by the CIA in Jordanian training facilities is unclear.” According to the New York Times there were between 3,000 to 5,000 fighters, and according to the Washington Post there were about 10,000 fighters. Therefore the CIA made up to $1 billion available for the program.”
8:36Furthermore, a terror expert who until 2005 had a seat
8:39with the chancellor, said back in 2011
8:42that Qatar’s new Syrian policies — that’s the country in which
8:45the world soccer championship will soon take place —
8:48that the Qatar’s Syrian policies
8:51will necessarily lead to a civil war in Syria, and again we will show you
8:54a link in the report
8:57that we compiled for this video.
9:00And now I already have mentioned the FAZ as a source,
9:03and since I also just presented a terror expert
9:06from the office of the chancellor as a source,
9:09yet so many have accused us that these were all conspiracy theories.
9:12Interestingly, now someone new will be the president of the USA,
9:15and this new US president, Donald Trump is who I am talking about,
9:18He said that, “I am in talks with US generals and they all tell me the same thing over and over: We are spending billions of US dollars in weapons and financial support for people that we don’t even know. These groups are probably worse than Assad. Assad is not innocent, and he probably is not a good man, but who exactly are these people and groups that we are supporting? And again: Libya…”
9:35Ladies and Gentlemen, these are words of the new president of the USA,
9:38words that just a year ago were seen as conspiracy theories,
9:41Words, however, which had been known to many security experts,
9:44people with whom I could talk from security circles,
9:47these are words that were well known even then, and
9:50today the new president of the United States says these words.
9:53Does that not make us think?
9:56But, as is often the case, the arsonist himself
9:59will not extinguish the fire. Up through today Saudi Arabia
10:02has not taken in a single refugee, and the USA barely 10,000 Syrians.
10:05And the most interesting thing is that these are data from the
10:08State Department of the USA, the foreign ministry
10:11of the United States, where Syrians were only admitted
10:14after a security vetting process lasting an average of 18 to 24
10:17months, by various secret services.
10:20We have let in people uncontrolled, without control,
10:2380% without any identification papers, as we now know,
10:26and about the… possible breach of law that has been committed
10:29by the chancellor, we’ve talked about this here extensively in the past.
10:32I personally have been shocked by Merkel’s migration politics,
10:35for all of these reasons.
10:38We have asked the question of whether Merkel broke the law,
10:41and there is a wall of silence in Berlin. I know from many representatives
10:44that they know all the facts and that not one of them
10:47has up until now dared to put this topic on the agenda in Berlin.
10:50With this video we want to contribute to opening the eyes
10:53of as many people as possible, and we want to
10:56especially illuminate a little closer the connections in
10:59the background that have led to this migration wave.
11:02In the first place, it didn’t just come from out of nowhere;
11:05it didn’t come all of a sudden and unexpected.
11:08I believe that has become clear here. We want to
11:11present facts, which in this time — which allegedly
11:14has become a post-factual time — is extremely important.
11:17You can read for yourself at all the links presented at the end.
11:20After 26 years, I left behind my consternation
11:23on October 8th, 2015 by leaving the CDU party,
11:26and believe you me it wasn’t easy for me.
11:29Dear Angela Merkel, please see to it that this CDU,
11:32which I was a member of for 26 years, again becomes
11:35the party of the Constitution. And dear representatives,
11:38please see to it that this wall of silence is smashed.
11:41At this point I want to mention a quote by Napoleon,
11:44which I will put on the screen here:
11:47”There is no nation more good-natured, but also none more gullible, than the Germans. No lie is too crude: the Germans believe it. For the sake of a slogan they were given, they persecuted their compatriots more grimly than their real enemies.”
12:01You can see that I am standing here in Frankfurt,
12:04I myself am the chairman of the association “Pro Cash Pro Freedom”.
12:07we’ve made two grand announcements in 2016 for the association;
12:10we are strictly bipartisan, just as this video isn’t supposed
12:13to cook up any partisan-flavored soups,
12:16and I don’t think it has, and I am asking you to please visit
12:19our website, at the link that we show you now, where you can read up on everything I just said,
12:24and where we provide you with all the sources.
12:27And furthermore there is a website, www.pro-bargeld.com,
12:30where we outline our important fight in favor of hard cash
12:33and our liberty, and here on our YouTube channel Silberjunge [Silverboy]
12:36you will also find what is happening right now about
12:39the cash situation and India,
12:42also what was announced on the day of the US election,
12:45and what is happening in Sweden, how
12:48it threatens our cash, and about the international war
12:51on cash, you will find a lot of information about all that.
12:54I’m pleased if you can make use of all this information.