History repeats itself once more, Ralph Northam’s words at about 1:50, “it was my responsibility to recognize [the black face photo] and prevent it from being published in the first place” and “the photo appears with others, I submitted on a page with my name on it” explain the truth of his concern is over being caught as a racist, no matter how much he claims, again, after being caught, some practiced denouncement of the images portrayed in the photo. And it’s proven by Northam’s admission in the same press conference (at about 3:05) that he had done blackface before. Sure he’s trying to appear transparent but, in fact, he’s only admitting he is the blackfaced person in the photo by Northam explaining a blackfaced appearance the same year. Consider for a moment why a person would need to wear blackface in a dance contest but, as it appears, to assume the “costume” of Michael Jackson, Northam’s word not mine, include being “blackface,” include racial identity which is ironic in light of Michael Jackson’s well documented use of drugs & makeup to lessen skin color inconsistencies as patches of Jackson’s skin became lighter because Jackson had a medical condition, vitiligo, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ and as a performer, obviously he’d not want an inconsistent skin appearance, no matter the color, and the disease appears to have no means of reversal.
But I stray from the point: Northam is saying, regarding the photo that he admits he submitted, that THIS TIME it’s not him, he did it at another time the same year (that’d be twice in one year) but no, just not THIS TIME, just not at the time in that photo that Northam admits he submitted.
It’s not hard to believe his story. It’s hard to fathom Northam or anyone would go through this much contortion to not do the right thing and resign. But it appears the racist part isn’t what’s important to Northam. In fact it appears Northam isn’t even mad about appearing racist, isn’t angry or otherwise upset at himself in any way at all. No Northam in incensed because he has again exposed the racism of the Democrat Party and is getting their ire for destroying their “We’re the multi-culturalist party” lie again.
In fact, as Northam stays in office as Virginia’s Governor he shows his racism.
If Northam steps down, Democrat Justin Fairfax, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/02/us/, would become the 2nd American Governor of African descent of Virginia in the history of the State! You’d think Northam would realize he’s standing in the way of “Progress” according to his own and the Democrat Party’s rhetoric but instead he defaults to the consistent Progressive Racism of the Democrat Party by denying he’s in the photo (he admits he submitted to be put on his yearbook page) and by staying in office knowing Lieutenant Governor Fairfax is ready to take his place.
(Taking a long mental breath)… From hiding the truth about Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution being to end slavery; to the Dixiecrat Flag being the Democrat Party flag and flying that flag during the Civil War against Slavery Abolitionist Republican Abraham Lincoln trying to meet the Constitution’s hope to end slavery once and-for-all; to hiding successful former slave histories (to keep the narrative of American racism against blacks as an absolute so the talking point of fixing it is forever); to support of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger (with claims her words were taken out of context, even though she was a member of the Eugenics Society with Prescott Bush who supported Adolf Hitler); the 1957 Civil Rights Act being gutted for protecting voting rights for blacks (and thereby minorities) by then Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Banes Johnson (LBJ) so that LBJ could sign these same provisions into law 7 years later (striking black voter protections to make blacks wait another 7 years so Democrats could do it and buy the black vote); to the promotion now of Socialism as the means of solving poverty, always associating poverty with being black, like Barack Obama did here as an infamous lawyer for the Plaintiffs, https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FH-IL-0011-0008.pdf; in final today promoting that in all of us being impoverished by “free” healthcare, “free” higher education, “free” whatever our heart desires, with tax rates to PAY for it of 70% and above, Progressive Democrat “trickle down taxes” upon all of us ignoring reality that the top 5% of the wealthy pay 95% of government tax revenues already and if taxed 100% be not be able to pay for these “free” things, Democrats establish their forever constant isn’t fairness, or even equality in all of us being impoverished, but to use race and every other tactic to divide Americans and thereby conquer the American People/control us. (Yes that’s the most long-winded and likely ungrammatical sentence I’ve ever done even with my generally poor written grammatical skills).
Now the neat part is someone told us once that Democrats and Republicans switched parties around the 1920s and 1930s, a lie exposed by the 1957 & 1964 Civil Rights Acts, and here are the records to read for yourself, 1957, http://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/ and 1964, http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/.
This gives me a moment to refute a Democrat talking point of “The Republicans had the House, had the Senate, and the White House and President Trump didn’t get his wall.” Democrats are right, but they are playing a sleight of hand on us. You see both 1957 and 1964 Civil Rights bills above were filibustered for the same racist reasons. The 1957 is where Democrats required the striking of the provision in order to pass the legislation because there were not 60 votes to override the filibuster, a Senate Rule that exists to this day and was done to support a significant point of the Constitution, the same one that the Electoral College is intended to achieve which is to make sure there is a voice for the minority (not racial but political party wise). So even if there were 9 political parties and one dominated the government, if the other 8 joined together to achieve enough to deny 60 votes to override a filibuster a negotiation to get the legislation passed after a filibuster would occur. This is why the voter protections for blacks were filibustered to be struck from the 1957 Civil Rights Act Republican President Eisenhower would have signed with or without them just to make sure to advance the rights of blacks and, thereby, other minorities. You’ll note the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice was created by the 1957 Civil Rights Act, so everyone who has benefited from it, white, black, brown, yellow, green, purple, blue, polka dotted, Christian, Atheist, Satanist, straight, gay, lesbian, cisgender, transgender, non-binary, & every other asserter of their Civil Rights in their own self-interest needs to applaud and give Republicans and Eisenhower full credit for whatever they gained by their Civil Rights lawsuits.
The Wall at America’s Southern Border is a “no brainer” for a nation to assert its sovereignty.
Voting rights for Americans of African descent, those brought here in slavery who are no longer slaves due to Republican Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, is also a “no brainer.” But we forget it was the Slave Masters, those Dixiecrats, who lose their Progressive elitist power to treat people as “property,” or as Planned Parenthood would put it, as “tissue,” as “a clump of cells” in the Holier than Thou assertion of the Slave Master’s Right to Choose. This is what was at stake and held a Constitutional Right over even the children of slaves (See Dred Scott v. Sandford, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/60/393/). Yes, slavery has been upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States just like Roe v. Wade so the word mirror of slavery to abortion that I applied here isn’t a confusion or mistake, it’s just plain true.
Do you see the legal narrative construct and how the court helped pressurize and cause the Civil War by the specious claim of a truth about people who are American Citizens but no longer slaves, a claim that shocked the American conscience with an inhumanity that American Law from the drafting of the Constitution didn’t support or uphold (First 3 paragraphs of Federalist 42, where Madison refers to himself and his countrymen as “European brethren” in relation to “the unfortunate Africans,” https://www.congress.gov/resources/.
Now that the lie of “white uncaring slave owners drafted the Constitution” has been dealt with let’s talk about those freed slaves and children of slaves that were supposedly institutionally oppressed for their race, such as Maggie Lena Walker, https://www.nps.gov/articles/maggiewalker.htm. A black woman who is the child of a slave, who is also a Republican, does something amazing, she forms a bank! The Consolidated Bank & Trust Company was formed in 1903 by Maggie Lena Walker and is still in existence today, https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/.
Or maybe we should discuss Granville T. Woods, https://www.biography.com/people/, a black man who is responsible for sending voice over telegraph wires, and if the Progressive racist lie narrative held true Woods would not have 60 patents registered to him, nor have won against Thomas Edison, inventor of the light bulb, in a patent dispute!… Let that sink in: Granville T. Woods, a black man, won a lawsuit in the 1880s against Thomas Edison!
What a racist nation America is! What racists we Americans have always been to deny the illustrious and famous white Thomas Edison a win over Granville T. Woods, a free American who happens to be of African descent!…. Wait that would actually mean, if being prejudiced against blacks is racism that America was not then and, if it is now, it’s solely due to Progressive Dixiecrat policies, and in fact these 2 people (and there’s likely many many many more) demonstrate race meant nothing next to, as Martin Luther King put it, “the content of their character.” It is likely these people put forth their character over anything else. Their drive, determination, and care beyond themselves is what gave them stature, gravitas, and import in America’s generally colorblind society and government, irrespective of Progressive Democrat Party narratives to the contrary, and lies they try to make solely the province of Republicans, of Conservatives and the GOP, a total misdirection that Northam exposes with a clarity only last seen when Democrats tried to keep Justice Clarence Thomas off of the Supreme Court because he didn’t support the Progressive Racist Democrat narrative in who he is and how he leads his life.
Which leads us right into this 2011 video of anti-Koch Brothers Progressives opening with giving credit to Common Cause for their rally, where they also explain lynching Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who also happens to be an American of African descent:
So while muslims and some woman with the last name of a Spanish Conquistador, “Cortez,” you know the group responsible for bringing an end to the Aztecs, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_conquest_of_the_Aztec_Empire, and the Incas, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_conquest_of_the_Inca_Empire, are Democrats, we should realize they and Ralph Northam are consistent with the Democrat regime of Dixiecrat oppression from a delusion of on high over others, always seeking Progressive use of corrupt power. Throughout history, an elitist, ignoble foreign minded self-proclaimed Progressive Racist nobility always tries to rule over the masses with an iron fist in atrocity after atrocity against mankind, both before and after the existence of America. Of course now theirs is the constant challenge to Capitalism with every collectivist idea they can throw at it, making every Progressive effort to destroy the American economy of Freedom, you know that idea of living your life and making your own decisions to only be encumbered when you encroach upon another person because that is not your right, for example when the victim is a slave or a baby neither is property, neither is just tissue or a clump of cells subject to “the Master’s Right to Choose.”
Thank you for reading and sharing this and may God Bless you,
P.S. A little video of Joe Biden exercising the Progressive Democrat Racist Prerogative in 2008, apparently knowing no one would accuse him of racism since he’s already Barack Obama’s running mate in this video, just in case you thought maybe my case for the Democrat Party’s constant hiding of their racist centered certainty, and that it is masked solely for power, isn’t solid enough: