<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie</title>
		<description>Comments for The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie at http://www.rightsidenews.com , comment 1 to 15 out of 15 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:52:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>COLB is insufficient Plaintiffs want certified copy of Vital Record per Quo Warranto</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3876</link>
			<description>Only examination of Vital Record, and any other evidence Obama wishes brought to light, as demanded under quo warranto, will decide who occupies the Ovbal Office. - borderraven</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:27:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The COLB is a legally sufficient document</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3846</link>
			<description>I wish it weren't, but it is, unfortunately. It's simply not true that it's not legally sufficient.  - Toni LaSalle</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:09:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DNC CERTIFICATION OF CANDIDATES FILED IN CALIFORNIA</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3845</link>
			<description>DNC Chair Nancy Pelosi signed this document, and DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond, signed it, And a friend of mine in Sacramento obtain a copy in PDF, which he emailed to me.
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/19949541/SACCA20090916DNCCERT2008
California law protects the CA Secretary of State, so the onus to properly, legally, and competently vet candidates, is on Nancy Pelosi. If she relied on the flimsy residency document COLB, and not a LFCOLB, to vet a President, then she is either grossly negligent, mentally incompetent, participating in a conspiracy of election fraud, or all of the above. - borderraven</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:34:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Makes my week</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3835</link>
			<description>I've been fighting Obots in the blogs all week. I was Googling &quot;certification 2008 election party nomination president obama pdf&quot; when I saw this. 

So, where do you think BHO should be exiled after he gets out of prison?

What is the order of sucession to the Presidency, given the dwindling number of candidates? 

This cannot be ignored.  Interesting weeks ahead.
:/
BR - borderraven</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:24:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>conspiracy theory?</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3832</link>
			<description>Just a thought, but does the person who wrote this alleging a &quot;conspiracy theory&quot; have any problem with the fact that the signatures and writing of all of the signatories are different?

Look at the &quot;S&quot; in September in the second document and compare to the first (notary's writing).  Look at the differences in the Pelosi (&quot;s&quot;) signature.  The difference in the &quot;r&quot; in Travis.

You don't have to be an expert to determine that one of these documents was likely signed by the real people... and the other wasn't.

Just saying.

'Cause I like conspiracy theories. - rob</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:59:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3800</link>
			<description>Use the title Democrat Party. Immediately loose all credibility. - truepatriot</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:25:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3776</link>
			<description>I have copies of the 1980 certifications of the Republican National Convention, and the Democratic National Convention.   Neither has any language about the nominees being constitutionally eligible.  I wish I had more recent ones (but earlier than 2008, since you have them).  Have you tried to obtain copies of the 2004 certifications from either major party, to see if they have such language?  It would be interesting to see when the two national parties started adding that language. - Rich Winger</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:16:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3775</link>
			<description>I have copies of the 1980 certifications of both the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party, to the various states.  Neither of them includes language about the nominees being constitutionally eligible to serve.  Unfortunately, I don't have copies for any more recent presidential election.  Have you tried to find copies of, say, the certifications of 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004, to see if either or both national parties included such language those years?  I live in San Francisco and my phone is 415-922-9779. - Richard Winger</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:11:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3770</link>
			<description>As much as I would like to see this come before the Supreme Court, the court has no ability to make a decision until a suit of some sort has reached it through regular process.  The Supreme Court has jurisdiction only over &quot;cases and controversies&quot; which have reached them via some ordinary process of law.  One of the several suits filed in lower courts so far would have to make its way to the high court before the Supreme Court can make any decision. They have sole and original jurisdiction over certain matters (this might be one of them), but they still can't act until a lawsuit reaches them.  So far, none have. - LawhawkSF</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:05:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3768</link>
			<description>please tell us,,,, who or how do we go about requesting a copy of this form from our home states,,,,,,  what is the office to write too??  do we the public have a right to this doc thru FOIA

please give us some guidance on how to backup your claims indidvidually - johnny gilbert</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:49:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3765</link>
			<description>I (we) have known about a cover up way before the election and with these documents, someone in mainstream media that isn't totally controlled by our government has to bring this to light.

Until then, I will continue to hear the real news on[b] Coast to Coast AM  with G. Noory[/b] and [b]Michael Savage[/b], AJ, ATS.com and WND, and a few others.

By the way;  Thanks Barry S, for creating a [i]National volunteer Work Day[/i] today on 9,11, instead of mourning the 911 tragedy, all the innocent lives taken, our police, firefighters, and war hero's..........
........[i][b]All in the Name of Government and Corporate Greed!!![/[/b]i] - Troy Howland</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:19:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3764</link>
			<description>Bill Jones II,

See Article III, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution. - Toni LaSalle</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:50:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3761</link>
			<description>As a matter of expediency, I dont understand why the US Supreme Court doesn't simply take jurisdiction and order all of the necessary documents into court by a specific date and have the matter done with.  Unless they don't want another Bush v. Gore on their hands.  Lets have some leadership here.  I'm tired of the messing around.  But then again, President Joe Biden, isn't that scary  - Bill Jones II</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:30:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3760</link>
			<description>Great catch, Mr. Williams.  The evidence keeps piling up, doesn't it?!  What was the basis for the GOP blinding accepting Obama's claim to be a natural born citizen?  Does the GOP pay attention to fraud in election at all? - Sara</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:56:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JB Williams is mistaken: Hawaii's certificate uses the constitutional language</title>
			<link>http://www.rightsidenews.com/200909106381/editorial/the-theory-is-now-a-conspiracy-and-facts-dont-lie.html#comment-3756</link>
			<description>http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/hawaii-response.pdf - Toni LaSalle</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:55:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
