Comments for Common Sense Christian Part One Creationism versus Evolution at http://www.rightsidenews.com , comment 1 to 12 out of 12 comments http://www.rightsidenews.com Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:32:48 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-4448 Darwin was a racist - get a copy of the new film- Maafa21 which covers the history from slavery to eugenics (Galton_Darwin) and will show you with PROOF how Darwin's beliefs led to Eugenics and how Eugenics led to abortion. Maafa21 even gives never before seen insight into the racist/abortion attitudes of the US Gov't. Maafa21 quotes original Civil Rights leaders who gave a clear warning that Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, birth control and abortion were targets against the black community. It is worth the purchase - get it here and see a clip: www.maafa21.com. - Rapnsum Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:35:32 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-3634 The universe began as pure radiation. Who created the radiation? Those who favor teh theory of evolution like to begin with ready-made matter. The pesky question of where that came from? Not interested... - TimTom Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:15:33 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2691 "The opening line of Genesis says, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Genesis 1:1), so we know that God is the Creator. God existed before anything else (Genesis 1:2)." Your reasoning is circular and defies logic. You use the Bible as ground truth - and what it says proves your arguments? Where is your justification that the Bible is the literal truth? Most of the world knows that Bible is a collection of wisdom, but stories are not to be taken literally. The other arguments you propose against evolution are pretty tired. They were raised years ago and have been soundly laid to rest with much research and discussion over the years. Why do you keep bringing them up? You read about this very much? The world has moved on? - Cayman Paolo Diceda Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:15:09 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2579 "the scientific method is limited to the study of processes as they occur at present." There are established methods that can indeed answer the “when” question. As a simple example, given the velocity of an object and the distance it has traveled I can tell you “when” the object started moving. This example is not meant to be strictly analogous to the process evolution but it is illustrative of the ability of science to answer the “when” part of a question given adequate information. - less33 Thu, 28 May 2009 16:07:44 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2571 Common sense and logic prevails over magic! If you believe in Harry Potter you would believe in Moses the magician and his writings to fit the judeo-christian religion. Ask yourself why there are so many diverse religions, and divisions!! It is because of the imaginings of men and their desire to control others that are ignorant!!! The supernatural, this is what people want to believe, so they believe all sorts of things to become godlike! Ignorance still drives the engine of religion, but these too will soon become extinct and sensibility will someday rule...................... - Michael Summerson Wed, 27 May 2009 22:57:39 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2564 There's a problem here: [i]A theory is a hypothesis that has been tested many times but hasn't been refuted yet. And a law of science is "a theory that has been tested, with positive results, so often and in so many different ways that it is almost certainly a confirmed fact of science."[/i] Theories do not become Laws, they are 2 separate things. Gravity has a Law and Theory associated with it. Laws deal with the math part of a principle while Theories explain how it works. - RobD70 Wed, 27 May 2009 12:58:47 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2562 [quote]Evolution is derived from Naturalism, which assumes that things made themselves. Naturalism suggests God had no part in the creation of life and assumes He has not attempted to share with humanity any information about the past.[/quote] This is gross misrepresentation of the history of naturalism. Naturalism did not spring from nothingness. It evolved from earlier views of nature that assumed the Christian God as the creator. It evolved by a progressive discovery of more and more evidence not from a radical movement that suddenly decided to reject the notion of a creator-god as represented by this mythological view of Darwin. Naturalism still falls short at the cutting edge of knowledge, but those who declare the realm beyond our current evidence off-limits to science fall into the same trap as the men who wrote Genesis and other mythological accounts of creation: they assume that no real world physical evidence can ever be discovered to contradict them. They could be right, but history has proven them wrong. With the ability to take extremely precise physical measurements, rapidly sequence genes, map the planet, and process large quantities of data quickly with computers, the evidence is mounting faster now than ever. - Oran Wed, 27 May 2009 12:02:32 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2560 Finding oil is a very high-stakes issue for oil companies. Trillions of dollars are riding on it. When they need to find the most likely spots to drill, do they use young-Earth geology, or mainstream? Which one actually delivers the goods? If the Earth is only 6000 years old, where did the oil come from? If it was created in the ground, is there a way to predict where it might be found? Or perhaps it really did form from plankton, but 10,000 times faster than any chemist thinks it could? A young Earth and a Flood would imply some interesting questions to ask, some extremely valuable research programs to start. How come nobody's actually pursuing such research programs? Why don't creationists put together an investment fund, venture capital for things like oil and mineral rights? If "Flood geology" is really a better theory, then it should make better predictions than standard geology does. The profits from such a venture could pay for a lot of evangelism. Why is no one doing this? - Ray Ingles Wed, 27 May 2009 08:53:39 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2559 "At its core, evolution is the belief that "nothing" became "something." Non-living matter developed into living matter." I thought you would have figured out by now that this is not evolution, this is abiogenesis. Evolution is completely unrelated. This is akin to people that equate evolution to the big bang. Separate fields folks, try to stay on topic. - 8flake Wed, 27 May 2009 08:34:18 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2557 What this piece ignores is the overwhelming evidence of so many different types that show evolution is as much a natural process as gravity is or electricity, evidence that not only shows evolution happens but sometimes corroborates other evidence of diffeent types in stunning fashion. If God didn't use evolution as a tool of creation, then why did he plant so much evidence, all the evidence of the physical world, to make it look like it happens? If a literal interpretation of Genesis is required to be a "true" Christian, then the Christian God must be a malicious prankster. - The Bicycloing Guitarist Wed, 27 May 2009 06:07:42 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2552 Thank you Greene and Evan for producing a great article here. This is exactly the material we should be teaching our children in school (private and PUBLIC). The world is a better place when we can instruct our children and spread the Good News of Jesus Christ and that through him comes Salvation!!! - Steve Waters Wed, 27 May 2009 00:52:49 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200905264904/culture-wars/common-sense-christian-part-one-creationism-versus-evolution.html#comment-2543 - Fizzmick PaChee Tue, 26 May 2009 19:52:30 +0100