Comments for Vote NO on Radical Pro-Abortion Activist, Dawn Johnsen! at http://www.rightsidenews.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments http://www.rightsidenews.com Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:50:42 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200903184051/culture-wars/vote-no-on-radical-pro-abortion-activist-dawn-johnsen.html#comment-2057 WELL I DONT AGREE WITH OBORTION!!!!!!!!!! I THINK THAT IT IS REALLY NONSENSE 2 ABORT A BABY!!!!! A BABY IS A MIRACLE FROM GOD! THAT'S WHY IM VOTING NO FOR ABORTION!!! EVERYDAY THERE IS A GREATER PERCENTAGE OF ABORTION! PLEASE HELP VOTE FOR NO OBORTION!! ALSO GOD WILL THANK YOU VERY MUCH! IF YU ATLEAST HAVE FAITH!!!! NOOOO ABORTION!!! - No for Obortion!!!!!!!! Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:49:19 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200903184051/culture-wars/vote-no-on-radical-pro-abortion-activist-dawn-johnsen.html#comment-1813 I don't get these pro-abortion folks. I'm not totally against abortion. I feel in cases of rape, severe abnormality, mental disease or health risk that it's morally justifiable, at least in my mind. I know people feel as though no reason is justifiable but I think that's somewhat unreasonable. What I don't agree with is this slaughter going on in America today. Abortion is used as a form of birth control. This whoops I screwed up bye, bye life, oh well attitude has me a bit nervous. I was listening to the news one day on the radio many years ago. A mountain lion attacked and killed a jogger. Groups took up collection's on both sides of the issue. I found it a bit humorous to learn that the mountain lion collected 3 times more donations then the jogger. Why the controversy is because it's murder. I mean you can color coat it anyway you want but at the end of the day it's meets the textbook definition of murder. A reasonable mind would conclude that both sides have some merit in their argument. To say a woman doesn't have a right to abort a fetus conceived by means of rape , severe deformity, mental illness is wrong. On the pro-life side to use abortion as a means to correct an irresponsible action or combat social immorality is wrong, I would agree. What I find interesting is liberal double talk or hypocrisy. The ideology never has any firm footing in anything. They believe in one thing while it directly contradicts other beliefs within the ideology. Frankly I don't get the people. Save the polar bears and yet abort a million every year. Protest the war in Iraq and say nothing about the war on the streets of America to a tune of 38,000 dead every year. Is their a liberal anywhere that can explain this line of reasoning?. - RichieRich Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:41:40 +0100