Comments for Will Chief Justice Roberts Really Swear in a Complete Fraud? at http://www.rightsidenews.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments http://www.rightsidenews.com Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:45:24 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901123299/editorial/will-chief-justice-roberts-really-swear-in-a-complete-fraud.html#comment-1190 I heard some info that behind closed doors the Democrats are threatening to investigate George Bush and some of his Administration if the Republican's were to move to disqualify Barack Obama, Jr. I think the pre-mature and continuous media hype over Barack Obama, Jr's election is an effort to intimidate the Supreme Court. I talked to friends that are attorneys, spent numerous hours in libraries and on the net. Everything points in one direction, Barack Obama, Jr does not qualify as " natural born ". So what's the problem?. At what point does Barack Obama, Jr. actually break the law. The Electoral College vote or at the inauguration?. I mean this is an absolute joke. - RichieRich Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:44:31 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901123299/editorial/will-chief-justice-roberts-really-swear-in-a-complete-fraud.html#comment-1188 the constitution is the law of this nation. it says natural born . that is born of two citizens born in this country. Admendment 14 is not about the president. the presedent must qualify by article 2 section 1.Supreme court congress cant change that . olny admendment. There is no admendment to change that.Obama is using the equal protection claus in admendment 14 to circumvent the constitution.That is called unsurping. look it up. - geoff hamilton Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:40:32 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901123299/editorial/will-chief-justice-roberts-really-swear-in-a-complete-fraud.html#comment-1163 Natural born means on American soil to 2 parents who are citizens of the USA. His father was a Kenyan citizen AT THE TIME OF OBAMA'S BIRTH. His birth certificate can't erase OBAMA'S OWN DECLARATION OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP. "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" & "DUAL CITIZEN" ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE= YOU CAN'T BE BOTH. PERIOD. He WILL NEVER be able to CHANGE what he was at THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH. If he is sworn in on Jan. 20 it will only be A MATTER OF TIME before someone or some event happens which will bring his ineligibility back into focus & into court AFTER THE FACT. The Supreme Court can't do anything UNTIL AFTER A LAW HAS BEEN BROKEN OR A CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED. So,as a hypothetical, lets say Obama declares war after Iran nukes one of our cities. The first military person who decides s/he doesn't feel like fighting in Iran can challenge Commander-In-Chief Obama, by questioning his constitutional eligibility to be declaring war in the first place. Then the fun begins. The request for documents, depositions, etc will reveal under oath what most of us know already BECAUSE OBAMA TOLD US ON HIS WEBSITE: HE IS NOT ELIGIBLE BECAUSE HE WAS A DUAL CITIZEN AT BIRTH, NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. CAN YOU SAY "CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS"? It will make Watergate, Iran-Contra, Monica Lewinsky, Whitewater scandal look like a collection of short stories. Just wait and see... God bless America. - Buck Farack Obama Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:31:29 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901123299/editorial/will-chief-justice-roberts-really-swear-in-a-complete-fraud.html#comment-1155 I truly hope you right wingers keep beating this dead, rotten horse. The more you do it, the more ridiculous you make yourselves look. (BTW, "So help me God." [b]is not[/b] a part of the oath as written in the Constitution. It is something that the oath takers normally add in on their own. The word "God" appears no where in our secular Constitution, thank the Lord. - Robert Green Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:42:36 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901123299/editorial/will-chief-justice-roberts-really-swear-in-a-complete-fraud.html#comment-1154 The only relevant requirement for the Presidency here is that Obama be a natural born citizen. Up to this election, this has been understood as one who has U.S. citizenship at birth, as opposed to one who is naturalized later. That Obama also had British citizenship is irrelevant. He was a British citizen according to British law. Are we to let British law dictate who can be our President? That's not American. Those who believe that the Constitution says there are different classes of American citizens point out that the founders differentiated themselves from natural born citizens. It wasn't just because they were British subjects; rather, they were born before there was a United States of America for them to be born citizens of. That's the reason for the grandfather clause; it's really not that hard to understand. I hate seeing my fellow conservatives loosing their wits over this. It's making all of us look foolish, like those liberals who went mad over Florida results in 2000. -Dr. Matt Jones - Matt Jones Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:38:11 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200901123299/editorial/will-chief-justice-roberts-really-swear-in-a-complete-fraud.html#comment-1153 This is sort of rhetoric that gets people who question his citizenship labeled "conspiracy theorist". You can't say he is ineligible. We don't know whether he is eligible. The requirement is that he be a US citizen, not that he prove it by making his birth certificate public. Saying he is ineligible until he satisfies you is just wrong although it does make for some fiery preaching. - will Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:04:33 +0100