In the face of ever mounting evidence that CO2 is incapable of causing the level of global devastation prophesied by climate change catastrophists a new villain is being sought. The leading candidate is nitrous oxide (N2O), better known as laughing gas. A report in Science claims that N2O emissions are currently the single most important cause of ozone depletion and are expected to remain so throughout the 21st century. The IPCC rates N2O as 310 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO2 on a 100 year time scale. Is this a greenhouse gas bait and switch, or are the global warming alarmists trying to up the ante?

Scarcely a day goes by without a supposed expert advising us of the latest step we must take to save the world from a global warming apocalypse. But this week's proposal from Lord Stern of Brentford out-trumps them all.

A former civil service economist plucked from semi-obscurity by Tony Blair to become a guru on 'climate change', he now tells us the best way to stave off global warming is to give up eating meat.

The public is the biggest's loser as Greenpeace and the Met Office do not make the effort to turn up at the "Climate Fools Day" conference to learn what has changed our climate in the past 60 years and what will change our climate in the next 100.

What was hailed as the first public meeting to oppose the UK climate bill, The "Climate Fools Day" Anniversary Conference, convened by Piers Corbyn and WeatherAction.com, was in fact the launch of a long awaited public address to the advances in the Solar Weather Forecasting technique. Piers did not disappoint, he gave a brilliant demonstration of his forecasting principals that put the CO2 industry to shame.

The Science and Public Policy Institute 

The Senate testimony of Sec. Chu is predicated upon false assumptions, points out Christopher Monckton in a succinct letter to Senators posted by the Science and Public Policy Institute, [SPPI], a Washington DC -based NGO.

The letter points out that Chu's testimony cites the now-outdated 2007 Climate Assessment Report of the IPCC and a subsequent but also now-outdated MIT study, saying global warming by 2100 would be 7-11 F. "These excessive estimates are founded solely on computerized guesswork," says Christopher Monckton, former adviser to UK Prime Minister Thatcher and current SPPI policy adviser.