Comments for Global Warming Skeptics Prominently Featured At International Scientific Meeting at http://www.rightsidenews.com , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments http://www.rightsidenews.com Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:35:55 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200808191759/energy-and-environment/global-warming-skeptics-prominently-featured-at-international-scientific-meeting.html#comment-972 Ever since the google earth was launched i have been using it. It allows to see the world without ever having to leave your desk. It has been used as a learning tool and some people just find it quite addictive to sit and view various parts of the world.Most people think it’s live satellite imaging but if they knew it was only made up of old photos taken at various zoom levels patched together, it may lose a lot of appeal. Personally I think its good software just not something google should be investing millions into unless they find more uses for it. - winning at craps Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:48:11 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200808191759/energy-and-environment/global-warming-skeptics-prominently-featured-at-international-scientific-meeting.html#comment-824 It's time to stop nibbling around the edges and form a counter organization which pulls together all the skeptic views and data and presents them as a unified voice for accurate, peer-reviewed science. It does little good to have 650 separate voices asking questions and making statements statements from the audience. We need to be on the stage, presenting well-documented counter arguments. These views must be an integral part of any report from the IPCC. If the IPCC doesn't allow such counter arguments in their report, this in itself will be strong evidence of one-way science. - Dr. Herbert Lindberg Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:08:07 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200808191759/energy-and-environment/global-warming-skeptics-prominently-featured-at-international-scientific-meeting.html#comment-803 I wonder who history will prove to be the most confidently wrong, dead wrong - Bush or Gore ? - Bob78 Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:17:58 +0100 http://www.rightsidenews.com/200808191759/energy-and-environment/global-warming-skeptics-prominently-featured-at-international-scientific-meeting.html#comment-802 In the 80s I subscribed to Scientific American. At that time and using the same carbon dioxide stand that is the purported cause of of "Global Warming" today that august magazine warned of "Global Freezing." In fact, many of the magazines I read then warned of man made climate change driving is into an ice age. Now, here we are again but this time dissenters are giving voice. It remains to be seen if the dissenters views are respected and we move away from the over-heated rhetoric (pun intended) to true science. What we need to understand is how the planet's weather moves through cycles, [i][b]all [/b][/i]of the drivers of those cycles, identify where we are in a cycle, and predict how it will affect the earth for the purposes of public policy. Anyone who looks at the geologic record understands the earth has been cooler and warmer than now. I submit the earth does not have a thermostat which humankind can set for maximum personal and economic comfort. We need a larger research effort in this regard, and a little humility... ...well, maybe a [i]lot [/i]more humility. - Dale Smith Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:16:56 +0100