In 1933, Marius van der Lubbe set on fire the Reichstag. He was caught : a torch in hand and the Communist party membership card in pocket. The media exploded: Communists burnt the Reichstag. Hitler used this for the attack on the Communist party. The Communists were completely crashed. Thousands of them were arrested and sent to the concentration camps. Later it turned out that it was a provocation organized by Gestapo who just used van der Lubbe as a tool.
In any terrorist attack, the first question is: who gains from it? Would the German Communists win something from setting the Reichstag on fire? No, they would not. And who would?
Hitler and his party.
In July 2011, Anders Behring Breivik, 32, a blue-eyed blonde Christian, was accused of - first bombing government buildings in central Oslo and killing seven people, then 90 minutes later opening automatic fire on a youth camp sponsored by the ruling Labor party on the island of Utoya, 38 kilometers away. There, he murdered 85 of the 560 teens aged 15-16. The tall, blonde Breivik was captured on the island, still clad in police uniform, with a smoking gun in hand – and the 1500- paged manifesto he left on You Tube in which he confessed he was doing this as a part of the “Crusades” against Islam, multiculturalism, political correctness. Breivik also wrote that Europe must be saved from what he describes as Muslim colonization. In his manifesto and comments to his lawyer, he has said he wanted to start a revolution to inspire Norwegians to retake their country from Muslims and other immigrants. He blames liberals for championing multiculturalism over Norway's "indigenous" culture. So, Anders Behring Breivik is a classic example of the “Christian fundamentalist”, “Islamophobic”, “nationalist”, “racist” and other labels the European left- wing media immediately puts on anyone who has the courage to say he does not support the leftist agenda. 
A right-winger, a monster in flesh.
And of course, this extremist famous for his anti multicultural, anti-immigrants and anti- Islamic views, took the rifle and started to kill those dark- skinned black - eyed and black - haired Muslims whom he hates so much?
No. he killed 94 white, blue- eyed, blonde Norwegians, many of whom were Christians.
So, someone says he hates Muslims and immigrants - but for some reason kills native Norwegians many of whom were Christians?
But there is one more very strange thing in this massacre. The reasons of the bomb attack on the government building in which seven people died are more or less clear. He considered the Norwegian government the traitors , the enemies to the country and to the Norwegian people – and thus, his sworn enemy. So, he attacked and killed the enemies. Saint George killing a dragon.
And you want it or not, but the government officials and the heads of the government are quite legitimate military targets. If NATO quite officially declares that its aim is to kill Qaddaffi because he is the enemy of the West; why killing Jen Stoltenberg should be considered “illegitimate” by those Norwegians who consider him the enemy of Norway?
If Osama considered Obama a legitimate target- why should Osama think that Obama is not?
One people´s terrorist is another people´s freedom fighter.
But the attack on the youth camp and the massacre in cold blood of almost 90 Norwegian children aged 14- 16 is something very different. This horrendous murder can be neither “explained” nor “justified”. By doing this, Breivik made to the left- wing and multiculturalists the same favour van del Lubbe made to Hitler by setting the Reichstag on fire.
And now- the traditional question: Cui prodest?
Will the Right wing movement gain from this attack?
No. It was absolutely not in their interests. Their popularity is growing and they have very good chances to win the next elections in such European countries as Holland, Finland, Austria and make their positions stronger in Great Britain and France. The massacre will make these chances weaker, not better.
And who will gain? Evidently, those who see the growing popularity of the right wing- movements and parties in the European countries as a threat.
And who are those who see the growing popularity of the right- wing parties and movements as a threat?
