What is the advice you get in case of the computer system crash, when you tried all you could, from the starting your computer in the Safe Mode to giving it a kick, and the only way to make it move is starting with the security disk?
"Restore the system". If you follow this recommendation, your computer will load the last valid configuration, some 2 weeks (or two months, depending on the dates you chose as the restoration points) ago.
The law of any system: if something happens- get back to the point where this "something" has not happened yet and analyze what you did wrong that let this "something "happen.
Since 2001, the Western world is "at war with Islamic terrorism". I put the quotation marks, because in my opinion, it's the strangest war in all the history of the Mankind. It´s a war where the immense military and economic might of the United States supported by the European countries, Canada and Australia stands against the, as our media assures us, "small fringe" of Muslims who in their absolute majority also "condemn" the evil acts committed by this "small fringe" of the "lost sheep" and even, again as our liberal media and our political leaders with the President Obama at the lead assure us, "fight" these "lost sheep".
It's a war where the most powerful Secret Services in the world for years can not locate the whereabouts of the terrorist leaders- who give the interviews to the journalists. It´s a war where we have not yet defined neither who our enemy is, nor what our objectives in this war are. And at last, we have not until now answered the question, why the hell did they start this war against us?
Why did Muslims, "small fringe" or not, suddenly start to attack us in our own countries? And another question. For 9 years, since the 9/11, the combined might of the West plus the support of such paladins of the "Crusade" against the "Islamic terrorism" as Saudi Arabia and Turkey fights against....Oh My God, against who does this incredible might fight??? Against a "small fringe" of the poorly-armed "fanatics". And what is the result? At this moment, it looks like a draw.
Ok, the goals are not clear, the reasons are even less so, the enemy is someone from the Hollywood films about the "bad guys", and the only thing that is clear is that "we shall not waive our democratic values"... But the terrorism is here, in our countries, we feel it practically daily! Maybe it's time "to restore the system"? Let's find a moment in the past when this Islamic terrorism started and maybe it will help us answer the question what we must do to make it crawl back in its hole? The task becomes even easier, because the birth date of the Islamic terrorism can be defined with a precision to a minute. It´s 4:30 A.M., Munich, September 5, 1972, the Olympic Games in Munich. The attack by the Palestinian Arabs of the "Black September" terrorist group against the Israeli athletes. Here is when it started.
And what happened in the West at the end of the 60s?
Those who are in their 40s-50s will give the answer immediately: "New Era", "Sexual Revolution, " Hippies", LCD, integration, Martin Luther King and his "dream", political correctness, the fashion for the "left" movements and ideology, Che, Mao, "Make Love, Not War", the Vietnam veterans throwing their combat medals on the lawn before the White House, and the youth who burnt their draft messages in public are applauded and admired. The students - the most educated and advanced social group - openly condoned drugs and free sex. The linguistic taboos were destroyed - we are not bourgeois hypocrites! - and the West started to use the dirtiest words in public, from the TV screens, in the newspapers and in the student campus.
Homosexuality stopped being a shameful sexual aberration and all of a sudden became almost a sign of being among the "intellectual and art elite". And of course, the Human Life and the Human Rights...Human life suddenly became sacred, even if this is the life of a serial murderer and rapist. And the rights of an Individual were declared to have the priority over the rights of the Society! But, you want it or not, an Individual is a sub-system of the System called "Society"; the sub-system's rights simply can not be superior to the rights of the System as a whole, like "the rights" of a finger or a coccyx can not be superior to the "rights" of an organism as a whole, it's against logic and common sense! Never mind, says the "intellectual elite", if this is against the common sense - the worse for the common sense. Long Live the "Rights"! The illegal immigrants go out in the streets to defend their "rights" of illegally stay in America, Europe and Australia. The gays and lesbians go out in the streets to defend their "rights" to adopt children. Some Muslims demonstrate to defend their "rights" to build the mosque on the place where 3,000 Americans were murdered by other Muslims... Looks like soon the chinches will go out in the streets to defend their "right" to suck our blood!
Our moral values changed - and that was when the terrorism began.
And now, when we found the moment when this "Islamic terrorism" started, let´s look at what our "system" was before that, in , for example, late 50s. All the West was getting out of the ruins of the WWII. The life was pretty hard, the social guarantees were pretty modest, and the morals were pretty strict . And practically all the men in Europe and America were recent soldiers who would calmly and without any remorse simply hang any terrorist on the nearest tree between the first and second cup of coffee and would not even remember him two hours later: "the serious enemy threatening our entire civilization", by God! A cockroach from the waste - bin!
Until the mid-60s, any attack by Islamic terrorists on Europeans and Americans from the territory of any Islamic country would lead to the immediate and devastating retaliation strike on this country, no matter the number of casualties among the terrorists, enemy's soldiers or civilians who would have the bad luck to be near. Sounds cruel? But the problem is that the potential terrorists knew this - and did not even dare to dream about perpetrating the terrorist attack. So, there was no need to perpetrate the retaliation strike - and there were no casualties among the civilians!
But even in those times immigrants from Islamic countries were moving into Europe and USA, you say. Not in the quantities close to the number of a locust flight, like today, but - in quite enough numbers to serve as a recruit base for Jihad recruiters and to perpetrate the attack on "Godless West" from within. However, to our surprise, we shall not find even a trace of such attacks by Muslim immigrants against Europeans and Americans in those years.
The explanation is evident: the attitude of the Western society to the immigration problem was also very different then. Those who were lucky to get to Europe or USA knew and understood that this civilisation had been built by the Christian white people and that they were only guests in it. They knew that they were the second-class people, but this situation seemed fair and just to them. To be the second-class, third-class or twenty third-class in Europe or USA was better than to slowly die of hunger in Iran, Syria or Egypt. So - what to fight for? For converting Europe and USA into something similar to what they ran from: cruel, poor, dirty and dangerous? No, thank you.
They did not pretend on the social position of equality with those who had created the society they were living in.
And it would not occur to anyone to declare that some Arab or Turk who came to London without any documents the day before yesterday is equal in rights to the Englishman with twenty generations of ancestors living in this London for centuries! The immigrants also knew that the power and law were on the side of those who had created this civilization and that any conflict with them meant fast and sure deportation back home, where the immigrants would be all equal - in their right to die of hunger, and such an approach seemed to them quite fair and evidently well-reasoned.
The Life in their opinion was JUST!
And then, in the late 60s, the neo-liberals "informed" them that all the peoples, nations, countries, cultures and religions were equal. That we are all equal and have the equal rights for all . And finally, the neo-liberals started to root in the minds of Europeans and Americans the complex of guilt of Europeans and Americans before Arabs, Africans and all the peoples of the world and started "to explain" that these other peoples have the right- and are welcome - to pass to the Europeans and Americans the bill for "the centuries of "exploitation" , "unjustness" , and so on. And very soon the immigrants, until then loyal citizens who were happy with their social position, understood that the rich, educated and prosperous Europe and USA were in debt before them.
"I want what these white Christian dogs robbed me of back. Right now!"
THE Life in their opinion stopped being JUST
And the ideologists of the terrorism got what to offer to the people: these damned White Christians robbed us! Let's get back what was robbed!!! And this simple and unsophisticated but very attractive idea of "Robbing the Robber" was supported by the traditional Islamic "until all the world is for Allah". Terrorists offered to the people the attractive idea and made it look noble by connecting it to the imminently aggressive teaching of Islam. And the neo-liberals in student campus, in the media, at the international political forums "explained" to Europeans and Americans that these demands were right and just.
The eternal aggressiveness of Islam stopped to meet the resistance in the minds and souls of the people of the West.
And Muslims started to attack Europeans and Americans.
The REAL reason of modern Islamic terrorism is our weakness which is the consequence of our changed moral and ideological values.
Islam is an aggressive religion created by the aggressive nomads. It simply can not be peaceful! Islam is like a fierce wolf, but the wolves usually attack only the weakest, and the fiercest wolf in the forest does not attack the armed man! But what would you call me if I invite such a wolf to my house, open the door to him, explain to him that he, the wolf, has the total right to behave in my house in full accord with the traditions and customs of the wolves and when he, in full accord with the traditions of his tribe, jumps to my throat, I instead of simply shooting him would start to explain to him how bad it is to eat humans? And would you blame the wolf for eating me?
