The Right Conservative News Sites | Right Side News

Monday, Feb 13th

Last update03:29:30 AM GMT

You are here: Editorial World Opinion and Editorial A Military Strike on Iran's Nuclear Infrastructure?

A Military Strike on Iran's Nuclear Infrastructure?

E-mail Print PDF

Whether or not Iran's nuclear buildup will be stopped is the most urgent topic in the Middle East these days. I will occasionally note important developments on that issue here.

» If you like this article, please subscribe to our daily newsletter

"Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites": In a sensational report, Hugh Tomlinson writes in the Times (London) that

 

Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran. To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom's air defences will return to full alert.

Tomlinson quotes a U.S. defense source in the area: "The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way. They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren't scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the State Department."

He explains the logic behind this decision:

Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran's nuclear ambitions. "We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing," said one.

Comment: "Interesting if true" is my response. For reasons outlined in "Some Common Sense in Egypt and Saudi Arabia," I am skeptical that the Saudi leadership will allow Israeli overflights. Hope I am wrong. (June 12, 2010)

Surprising support for a military strike: The Pew Global Attitudes survey asked in 22 countries "Which is more important: Preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if it means taking military action, OR avoiding a military conflict, even if they may develop nuclear weapons?" The ENLARGE:

1237

There are many surprises here:

  • Pakistanis, Argentinians, Turks, and Russians the least ready to use military force. (Note that 3 our of 4 of them are neighbors of Iran.)

  • Chinese and Japanese also shy from use of military force.

  • Egyptians, Jordanians, and Kenyans have opinions analogous to those of Americans

  • Nigerians are the most ready to use military force.

(June 17, 2010)

 

» If you liked this article, please subscribe to our daily newsletter

Add comment

Comments at Right Side News are moderated, edited, and deleted at the discretion of the RSN administrator. Relevant and polite comments are very welcome. Comments that include inappropriate content, baseless accusations, name calling, links or language will be edited or removed. Inappropriate content includes that which is rude, vulgar, belligerent or otherwise irrelevant or that include links to sites that meet the same description. Spam is also deleted. There is a 1,000 character limit per comment. Longer comments can be submitted for review as an editorial on the "Submit Content" at the bottom of this page. Acceptance not guaranteed. Personal attacks against authors will not be posted.


Security code
Refresh


* If you like this article, consider subscribing to our daily newsletter by clicking here.

*Registered Members Don't See this PopUp, Register Free and get the benefits.