Obama Leads The UN Gungrabber Pack!
Back in October of 2009, the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, publicly announced that the US WOULD support UN negotiations of an Arms Trade Treaty to regulate international gun trafficking. The Bush administration, you may remember, and, notably, former Permanent U.S. Representative to the United Nations, John Bolton, opposed negotiations of this treaty for years.
Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has said: "Conventional arms transfers are a crucial national security concern for the United States, and we have always supported effective action to control the international transfer of arms. The United States is prepared to work hard for a strong international standard in this area."
The US then joined a vote, which was almost unanimous; to adopt a resolution, which would set a schedule, a timetable, on the proposed Arms Trade Treaty. Within that resolution was a proposal to finalize the accord in the year 2012.
Gun Owners in the US are gravely concerned over this move by the UN - and -- more importantly, by the Obama Regime, to support it. To many gun enthusiasts it is a dangerous submission of America's Constitution to "Global Governance" -- and there is a growing belief that it is an attempt by the Obama Regime to create private gun control laws it knows it cannot get through the US Congress. It doesn't take any imagination, at all, to quickly understand that this treaty would effectively cancel rights granted US citizens by the 2nd amendment to the US Constitution. Our right to "keep and bear arms" would no longer exist.
US gun rights supporters are up in arms - and with good reason. John Bolton, former Permanent U.S. Representative to the United Nations, fought the proposed treaty for quite a while. He has seen it up close and personally. Bolton, in remarks he made recently to Ginny Simone, managing editor of the National Rifle Associations' NRA News and host of the NRA's Daily News program, said the following:
"The administration is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there's no doubt - as was the case back over a decade ago - that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control."
Bolton continued:
"There's never been any doubt when these groups talk about saying they only want to prohibit illicit international trafficking in small arms and light weapons, it begs the whole question of what's legal and what's not legal. And many of the implications of these treaty negotiations are very much in their domestic application. So, whatever the appearance on the surface, there's no doubt that domestic firearm control is right at the top of their agenda."
Bolton went on to say: "After the treaty is approved and it comes into force, you will find out that it has this implication or that implication and it requires the Congress to adopt some measure that restricts ownership of firearms," he said. "The administration knows it cannot obtain this kind of legislation purely in a domestic context ... They will use an international agreement as an excuse to get domestically what they couldn't otherwise."
It turns out there are some seven countries pushing the UN Arms Treaty, Great Britain, Australia, Argentina, Costa Rica, Finland, Japan, and Kenya.
Interestingly, Great Britain has had a virtual explosion of violent crime since they all but banned guns back in 1997. Just a few months ago, the British press reported that England and Wales now have the highest violent crime in the European Union - a rate which, in fact, exceeds that of the United States and even hyper-violent South Africa. Mailonline reported: "In the decade following (the election of the Labor Party) in 1997, the number of recorded violent attacks soared by 77 percent to 1.158 million - more than two every minute."
It seems that Great Britain, with their near ban of gun ownership by private citizens, has a violent crime victimization rate of 2,034 per 100,000 residents. While here, in the, oh, so violent, USA, with our far less restrictive gun laws, we have a violence rate of only 466 crimes per 100,000 residents. Even South Africa's rate is lower, at 1,677 violent crimes per 100,000. You can read an exceptional article on this subject HERE.
In the land "down under," Australia, the Aussies are suffering an escalation in violent crimes as well. The Australia Institute of Criminology reports that assault alone occurs at a rate of 840 per 100,000 - a rate that increased dramatically since the Port Arthur ban.
You might find it interesting what the Aussies have to put up with now that firearms are nearly banned in their fair land. It is, indeed, a warning for their cousins, the Americans. "The Manly Daily" reported, back in October of 2009, that pursuant to the Australian Firearms Act of 1996:
"Northern Beaches Police will be turning up on the doorstep of every licensed gun owner in the area over the next four years to check their firearms are stored correctly.
Operation Aston follows the gun amnesty that ended on May 31 and will target guns stored incorrectly and the security of gun safes, Northern Beaches Commander Doreen Cruickshank said.
"Gun owners have a responsibility to ensure their weapon is safely stored at all times when not in use," Supt Cruickshank said.
"Licensing police will be attending the home of every licensed firearm owner in the northern beaches over the next four years to inspect every weapon and check the gun safe.
"Officers will be examining all gun safes to ensure they comply with the legislative requirements, particularly in relation to the standard and security of safes."
Supt Cruickshank reminded all legitimate owners that under the Firearms Act they must take all reasonable precautions to ensure the safekeeping of their firearms.
"It's especially important that weapons are stored in such a way as to limit the possibility of loss or theft, so they don't come into the possession of a person who isn't authorized to hold them," she said.
The maximum penalty for incorrect storage of a weapon is two years in jail. (You may read the article HERE. )
You might be interested to know this, as well: In Australia, for every firearm, a purchaser must obtain a Permit To Acquire. The first permit for each person has a mandatory 28 day delay before it is issued. In some states, such as Queensland, this is waived for second and subsequent firearms of the same class, whilst in others, it is not. For each firearm a "Genuine Reason" must be given, relating to pest control, hunting, target shooting, or collecting. Self-defense is not accepted as a reason for issuing a license.
THIS is where America is headed if the "gungrabbers" get their "reasonable gun control" laws. They know they cannot get those laws passed through CongressTODAY -- but they have an excellent chance to get them through the UN Arms Trade Treaty.
J. D. Longstreet is a conservative Southern American (A native sandlapper and an adopted Tar Heel) with a deep passion for the history, heritage, and culture of the southern states of America. At the same time he is a deeply loyal American believing strongly in "America First".
He is a thirty-year veteran of the broadcasting business, as an "in the field" and "on-air" news reporter (contributing to radio, TV, and newspapers) and a conservative broadcast commentator.
Longstreet is a veteran of the US Army and US Army Reserve. He is a member of the American Legion and the Sons of Confederate Veterans. A lifelong Christian, Longstreet subscribes to "old Lutheranism" to express and exercise his faith.
Articles by J.D. Longstreet posted: "INSIGHT on Freedom"
"Hurricane Alley... by Longstreet" and "The Carolina Post" and numerous other conservative websites around the web.
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by JimPC, January 15, 2010
-
- +3
-
-
written by Montana Libertarian, January 15, 2010
"From my cold, dead, hands."
and:
"I'll give you my guns: bullets first."
-
- +3
-
-
written by Sammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, January 16, 2010
-
- +1
-
-
written by Politerrorist, January 16, 2010
Who will knock at your door? MERCENARIES! Where there is a dollar, there is someone willing to earn it.
Do not think for one moment that 'someone else' will come to your rescue. You will have to defend yourself and your family.
The Constitution has been constantly attacked since its inception. Our government is not protecting our rights, they are finding ways around them to control us. Slavery is not gone...it's called WELFARE
-
- +4
-
-
written by Southern Guy, January 16, 2010
-
- +2
-
-
written by Mojavegreen, January 16, 2010
Dave
Oath Keeper (www.Oathkeepr.org)
-
- +2
-
-
written by Peter Wilson CD., January 16, 2010
I'm sorry to burst your bubble but the bodies piling up would not be the "blue tops". Have you forgotten about Katrina? Don't you remember how the local police when around confiscating guns from law abiding Americans, leaving them vulnerable to roving gangs of thugs. To add insult to injury, some to this day, have not had their lawful property returned to them. We ALL live (Canada included) in a benign POLICE STATE. If they want your guns they'll take your guns. Sure, there will be some "John Wayne" types screaming, " remember the Alamo" as they return fire. However, after the body count starts to climb, the rest will start having second thoughts and say things like, "I got a wife and kids to think about" before they finally put down their AR-15 and succumb to the new order. Sad but true. IMHO.
-
- -1
-
-
written by Mojavegreen, January 16, 2010
Dave,
www.oathkeepers.org
-
- +3
-
-
written by btw, January 16, 2010
-
- +0
-
-
written by Pissedpatriot, January 16, 2010
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of tyrants and patriots".
-
- +3
-
-
written by Mojavegreen, January 17, 2010
Has anyone asked about the implications of how the presidential decree signed by obama would effect the UNs ability to run this country( the decree I speak of was the rewriting of the law which now allows INTERPOL free access in USA)
-----
No I havent. I am courious about it though. Just how much access they have. Do they have the authority to act with out a u.s. law enforcement agency member being with them? If not that could lead to some interesting events. Not to mention another cops like t v show......
-
- +1
-
-
written by Bill Carson, January 18, 2010
plus one pair of generation 3 night vision goggles. A truck load of ammo and reloading equipment. Then add to that me being X Vietnam Vet who was a sniper.
Tell the UN to come on down and pick these up. I will be waiting.
-
- +3
-
-
written by bill witten, January 18, 2010
The result of this "executive order 13524" allows for arrest, detention, search and seizure and a slew of other acts of authoritarian and arbitrary action against persons at any time and any place for any reason without just cause or burden of proof. A most suspicious aspect portrayed as reason for "executive order 13524" is to permit a foreign police organization INTERPOL to function and operate within US sovereign borders and territory, free of oversight and justification. It is in the most simple terms a complete breakdown and usurpation of natural and constitutional law.
-
- +0
-
-
The only folks foolish enough to try to get the guns would be UN troops, and there are not enough of them. They would have to go house to house to get them. The bodies would be stacking up on city streets worse than they are now in Haiti. I think this article is scary, and it is designed to do so. In the real world no politician would endorse this because the carnage would be too terrible.