When an American-born radical Islamist cleric chose to praise last week's Fort Hood shooting spree by Army psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan, part of the rationale was that no Muslim could faithfully serve the U.S. armed forces.

To Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki, that's because "The US is leading the war against terrorism which in reality is a war against Islam."

A 2005 Canadian study of radicalism concluded that this theme is a potent tool in recruiting Muslims and turning them into violent extremists.

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) report was on youth radicalism and Hasan is a 39-year old with advanced college degrees.

Associates are stepping forward with accounts showing that Hasan was frustrated by what he saw as an American war against his faith.

The Washington Post obtained a copy of Hasan's June 2007 presentation at as part of his residency program at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Among the statements that disturbed his colleagues, Hasan declared that "It's getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims."

A student who took an environmental health class with Hasan at Uniformed Services of the Health Sciences in Bethesda describes him as someone who believed the United States was waging war against Islam. At the end of the class, all of the students had to give a presentation. Many wrote about course-related topics such as dry-cleaning chemicals and mold in homes, Lt. Col. Val Finnell said.

But Hasan (who told classmates he was "a Muslim first and an American second,") chose instead to write about the wrongness of the war on terror. A former classmate told the New York Times that Hasan gave a PowerPoint presentation approximately one year ago entitled "Why the War on Terror is a War on Islam."

Hasan has not been charged in the shootings which left 13 people dead. Sources have indicated he will face a military court martial for murder charges that could bring the death penalty.

According to the CSIS report, "the perception that Islam is under attack from the West" is the most important factor in persuading would-be jihadists that they must preemptively and violently defend Islam from these perceived enemies.

According to a summary of the report's findings:

"A few will act on these events and support or carry out terrorism in an attempt to change Western foreign or military policy. These individuals take the violent defense of Islam as a personal goal and religious obligation."

The idea that the United States is fighting a war against Islam has been advanced by Osama bin Laden, who has cited Western efforts to isolate Hamas and support for a peacekeeping force as evidence of a "Zionist-crusaders war on Islam." Awlaki, a former spiritual leader at Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, works to encourage jihadist activity with online lectures from his home base in Yemen.

Awlaki, may have crossed paths with Hasan, who attended Dar al-Hijrah in 2001. U.S. officials knew Hasan sent 10 to 20 messages to Awlaki last year and this year, but counterterrorism officials said these were consistent with a research project Hasan was conducting on post-traumatic stress disorder.

In praising Hasan as a hero, Awlaki called him "a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people."

While American Islamist organizations are quick to condemn the Fort Hood massacre and are desperately trying to cast it as a mere criminal act, they have fueled the U.S. "war on Islam" canard since 2001. It has been used to squelch serious debate over their behavior and to discredit virtually all U.S. government efforts to combat Islamist terror. It should come as no surprise, though, that some jihadists hear this and feel compelled to "respond" to the imaginary threat.

Leading the pack is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which routinely casts federal investigations and prosecutions involving alleged terrorists and financiers as a war on Islam.

For example:

• After the U.S. government froze the assets of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development in 2001, CAIR and other Muslim organizations issued a press release expressing concern that these charges "result from what appears to be a 'war on Muslims' rather than a 'war on terror.'
• Responding in June 2002 to a Justice Department initiative to locate suspected terrorists, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad asked: "What is next? Forcing American Muslims to wear a star and crescent as a means of identification for law enforcement authorities?"
• In 2003, after U.S. Sens. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Charles Schumer (D-NY) held hearings on Wahhabist influence in the United States, CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper declared that Kyl and Schumer "are jumping on this issue in order to demonize all Muslim groups and all Muslims in America."
• In 2004, when FBI Director Robert Mueller asked Americans to be on the lookout for seven Muslim terror suspects, Hooper dismissed Mueller's request as "part of the 'round up the usual suspects' mentality." Hooper added: "When you don't have any other leads, you gather up the Muslims."
• "The new perception is that the United States has entered a war with Islam itself," CAIR Chairman Parvez Ahmed said at the National Press Club in Washington in July 2007.

CAIR is by no means alone in this propaganda campaign. Officials with the Muslim Students Association, Islamic Society of North America and Muslim Public Affairs Council all have repeated the theme.

It's a little ironic that counter-terror policy is viewed as an attack on Islam when CAIR and other Islamist groups immediately seek to remove religious motivations from terrorist attacks like Hasan's, and others.

No one is saying people can't disagree with U.S. policy and tactics in the fight against terrorists. At some point, though, the critics need to assess whether their approach does more harm than good. Few things have been more harmful than Hasan's rampage.

------------------

Read More AT: The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) is a non-profit research group founded by Steven Emerson in 1995. It is recognized as the world's most comprehensive data center on radical Islamic terrorist groups. For more than a decade, the IPT has investigated the operations, funding, activities and front groups of Islamic terrorist and extremist groups in the United States and around the world. It has become a principal source of critical evidence to a wide variety of government offices and law enforcement agencies, as well as the U.S. Congress and numerous public policy forums. Research carried out by the IPT team has formed the basis for thousands of articles and television specials on the subject of radical Islamic involvement in terrorism, and has even led to successful government action against terrorists and financiers based in the United States.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

The biggest of big lies abt the war on islam
written by Peter Klevius, November 11, 2009

Islam has from scratch been an attacking "faith", & if you are under attack & defend yourself it's called war, isn't it! Against this background I really don't understand the headline. Nor does the article give any hint whatsoever. Moreover, most of islam's basic tenets are opposite those of U.S. & the free democratic world. In fact, there's an enourmous & desperate effort to "reformulate"/"reinterpret" islam/Koran while simultaneously belittling the products of Enlightenment (which, btw, was caused by an attacking islam). Islam started & built its tenets as a parasitic slave finance combined with sex slavery & rapetivism confined in Sharia & apostasy ban. That's why sex jihadism made it initially so successful, that's why O.I.C. (Organization of Islamic Countries) have their own "human rights" & now wants to (via UN) criminalize criticism of islam.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

THE ISLAMIC WORLD WAR
written by The Infidel Alliance, November 12, 2009

We have to understand that we are NOT in a "War on Terror" any more than WW2 was a "War on Blitzkreig". You can't be at war with a tactic.

9/11 was no "terror attack". It was an Islamic military attack against the infidel worlds economic, military and political centers. It was designed to collapse the west in four aerial strikes of the "Saifullah" (The Sword of Allah....the same sword that appears on the Saudi flag). It nearly succeeded.

The hard truth is that we are in an ISLAMIC WORLD WAR. Yes....an ISLAMIC WORLD WAR. Let's look at the FACTS:

Islam against the:
- Catholics in the Philippines
- Christians in Indonesia & Malaysia
- Buddhists in Thailand
- Hindus in India
- Zoroastrians in Iran
- Chaldean Christians in Iraq
- Jews in Israel (and everywhere else they live)
- Coptic Christians in Egypt
- animists & Christians in the Sudan
- Jews in Yemen
- Christians in Nigeria
- athiests in Europe
- schoolchildren in Beslan Russia
- train commuters in Spain
- tube commuters in London
- office workers in New York (twice!)
- Defense workers at the Pentagon
- Jewish centers in Buenas Aries, Caracas, Mumbai, Toronto & Seattle
- Christian schoolgirls in Indonesia (beheaded)
- Journalists like Daniel Pearl (decapitated)
- Nicholas Berg, Jack Hensley, Eugene Armstrong, Piotr Stanczak, Kim Sun-Il (beheaded)
- Cinematographers like Theo Van Gogh (slaughtered in broad daylight on the streets of Amsterdam)
- Jews in Saudi Arabia (exterminated by Muhammeds genocide)
- Jews in Yemen (soon to be exterminated after living there for over 2,000 years)
- infidel Korean tourists in Yemen (blown up)
- infidel Australian tourists in Bali (blown up, twice)
- Jewish cafe patrons in Israel(blown up repeatedly)
- women (subjugated, oppressed, beaten, sexually mutilated, honor killed, acid attacked)
- gays (routinely lynched & murdered)

Just a few misguided misunderstanders of Islam hijacking a noble religion of peace? NO.

This started in 622 AD when Muhammed left Mecca for Medina, and began his campaign of terror, slaughter, enslavement, rape, looting and subjugation, and has been burning non-stop ever since. The much maligned "Crusades" should be more appropriately called the "ANTI-CRUSADES", because it was Europe who was being invaded by the marauding Islamic armies first, not the other way around. Ask the Sikhs and Hindus of India about their centuries old fight against Islam. Ever wonder why the great Cathedral of St. Sophia is now a mosque?

This is not us against them, and never has been. This is Dar al-Islam against Dar al-Harb (the 'infidel' world) in an Allah inspired, Qur'an sanctioned, Muhammed mandated 'holy war' of Islamic supremacy.

The ISLAMIC WORLD WAR. Let's start calling it what it really is.

~ The Infidel Alliance

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

Subscribe via email (registered users only)

I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.

Add Comment