Logo

Social Engineering in the Guise of Health Care Reform

Written by Tom McClusky - TheCloakRoomBlog.com

Share

A few months ago we were surprised to get a number of phone calls from the media asking about the original health care bill, H.R. 3200, containing "home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children." That might not have been surprising but their source was unusual - it was superstar Chuck Norris.

Digging a little further and with some help from the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) who also made the controversial provision more public, it turned out that Mr. Norris was right.

chuck-norris-0021-240x300As HSLDA points out "All of these detailed aspects of the home visitation programs are open to being politically influenced by government bureaucrats who may think that they know more about parenting than parents do. They may pressure parents to adopt child-rearing methods that are against the family's religious beliefs. Home visitation officials may even threaten families with abuse and neglect investigations if the families do not choose to follow the official parenting education models." Additionally, HSLDA points out the the program has the government teaching first-time pregnant women to teach about "increasing birth intervals between pregnancies..." and this may result in government officials teaching and coercing young mothers about birth control or abortion services that violate the mother's religious beliefs.

Well we need Chuck again. Section 1904 of Speaker Pelosi's new bill H.R. 3962
brings back the questionable provision.

With the help of some great research from some hill folks here is a list of some of the problems in the current health care bill introduced by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) yesterday. This can also be downloaded here

H.R. 3962:

Social Engineering in the Guise of Health Care Reform

This document is not comprehensive, but highlights many of the problems within the House Democratic Leadership's health care plan.

ABORTION

Taxpayer funding of abortion

The new bill, H.R. 3962, uses the marketing gimmicks prevalent in the Capps amendment, passed in the Energy and Commerce Committee (Sections 222 (e), 203, 213, 258, 259, 304 and 341 (c)) This is a direct attempt to bypass the Hyde Amendment by authorizing government subsidies to go to plans that provide coverage for abortion, including abortion in the public government-run health plan. This provision will do nothing to reduce the actual demand for abortion or the number of abortions performed in the United States. This is an intentional attempt to subsidize plans that cover abortion both in the public health option and in private plans under new government controls.

Promoting abortion

A new provision (Section 1255) expands school based health clinic and prohibits grants for abortion and defines school based health clinics as clinics that do not perform abortion. However, there is no language regarding abortion referral or facilitating an abortion at another location.

Indian Health

Division D of H.R. 3962 reauthorizes the Indian Health Service but omits the permanent ban on abortion funding that was passed in the Senate last Congress. Speaker Pelosi stopped the original Indian Health bill in the House - reportedly due to concern that an abortion funding ban might be successfully attached in the House. The language in H.R. 3962 seeks to do an end run around the stalled legislative process.

Assisted Suicide

Section 240 of H.R. 3962 requires insurance companies to provide information related to "end-of-life planning" to individuals seeking enrollment in insurance offered on the health insurance exchange. Broader protective language adopted in the Energy and Commerce Committee has been removed by Speaker Pelosi, creating a loophole that means H.R. 3962 will require the distribution of end of life materials that will likely include information about assisted suicide options in states such as Oregon and Washington.

Rationing

The bill establishes a new Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research but omits language (section 1401) that was included in committee that the bureaucracy established to create minimum benefit standards should "ensure that essential benefits coverage does not lead to rationing of health care."

MISCELLANEOUS

Redefining Family

Section 571 attempts to rewrite current tax law and redefine the family by allowing domestic partners to be the equivalent of spouses. The text in the health care bill is almost identical to the text of a bill that Human Rights Campaign has been pushing, H.R. 2625.

Sexual Predators eligible for funding

On Page 1925 there is funding for "perpetrators of child sexual abuse who are Indian or members of an Indian household." through the Indian Health Service portion of the bill.

Trial lawyers protected

States can only get funding for liability demonstration projects ONLY IF they do not cap damages or attorneys' fees. Earlier this month the Congressional Budget Office said that tort reform would save $54 billion over the next decade. A Health and Human Services study found reasonable limits placed on non-economic damages would reduce cost by an estimated $25.3 billion to $44.3 billion ANNUALLY. Many states have found millions in savings in their states by introducing tort reform. One reason why trial lawyers are left untouched is the millions they give to Democrats every election cycle.

ACORN and Planned Parenthood Get Theirs?

Section 305 allows for the "Commissioner" to contract with "appropriate entities" to engage in "outreach to specific vulnerable populations" about the new programs in the bill. The bill includes no prohibition on ACORN or Planned Parenthood receiving this funding, despite the mounting evidence of malfeasance from those organizations.

Nanny State

Section 2572 has the federal government regulating vending machines, to ensure everyone can see the nutrition labels on items in plain sight before purchasing their food.

Unborn aren't protected, but Fido is

Sections 765 and 340m allow veterinary students eligible for $283 million federal grant funding, including scholarships and loan forgiveness.

What is good enough for you . . .

Section 330 specifically does not require Members of Congress to enroll in the government-run plan

COST

When introducing the legislation Speaker Pelosi insisted the Congressional Budget Office says her bill ""meets President Obama's call to keep the cost under $900 billion over 10 years." This is only true if you ad in the huge penalties (over $160 billion) imposed on individuals who do not have insurance and employers who do not provide insurance. The actual cost is $1.055 trillion. This cost does not include additional federal spending included in the legislation-including extension of Medicaid "stimulus" funding to the States, a new reinsurance program for retirees, and a $34 billion trust fund for public health-that totals $224.5 billion.  When combined with the cost of the coverage expansions, total spending under the bill actually approaches $1.3 trillion.

There's a separate 13-page bill to repeal the sustainable growth rate caps on Medicare spending, better known as the "doc fix." This separate bill will cost more than $200 billion.

The bill is offset by large cuts to existing spending programs to the tune of $426 billion and by increasing taxes from anywhere between $572 billion to $729.5 billion. A large section of the cuts is to current Medicare programs, including Medicare Advantage. Additionally the taxes are not indexed for inflation, meaning the tax will end up being imposed on those making less than $250,000. Many of the tax raises are directed towards doctors, drug manufacturers and those who purchase medical supplies -so are also likely to be passed to consumers at all income levels.

-----------------------------------------

You are now being logged in using your Facebook credentials