|
Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama's Constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States was just a blip on the radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article about how easy it was to find my then -92-year-old mother's birth certificate. Frankly, I didn't think finding my mother's birth certificate was possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn't speak English. Despairing that she would never be "qualified" to receive the care [in a nursing home} that she desperately needed, I set about to find the document, which I was sure had vanished in the unreliable record-keeping of 1913.
When I called the third number, I explained to the woman who answered the phone that I was "asking something impossible." I gave her my mother's first name and her father's last name. Within four minutes, she said, "Here it is!" When I expressed my amazement, the woman said: "That's nothing...we're routinely asked to find birth certificates from the 1800s, and we do that all the time!" Total time it took me to find my mother's 1913, born-in-a-farmhouse birth certificate: 10 minutes! Obama was born not in 1913, like my mother, but in 1961 - or perhaps in 1957, according to his MySpace page, which would make him 52, born supposedly in Hawaii before it became a state in 1959. So it was quite curious that not one cyber-sleuth could find an authentic, verifiable copy of his original vault copy birth certificate. I'm not talking about the faux version Obama posted on his website, which was deemed the real thing by FactCheck.org, a "truth"-detecting site that is sponsored by the Annenberg Foundation, the same foundation that hired Obama and his terrorist pal William Ayers and gave them millions of dollars for a research project in Chicago. In other words, the least credible source! Even more significant is that no one in the media thought Obama's missing birth certificate worth even casual mention. Their thinking seemed to be: If we're not going to check on his eligibility to be president, then why question why the other crucial documents were - and continue to be - sealed? For instance: his baptism certificate; elementary, high school, college and graduate school transcripts; visa(s); selective service record; alleged multiple Social Security numbers; Illinois attorney's license; Illinois State Senate records; law practice client list; Univ. of Chicago scholarly articles; financial records while a community organizer in Chicago; and medical records. I'm also curious about why Michelle Obama's law license was suspended in 1993 by the Illinois Supreme Court, but then again she wasn't running for president. Instead, the media were frantically busy trying to divert public attention away from those pesky things known as credentials with gossip-driven tabloid reportage of Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber in order to avoid the bigger-than-Watergate potential scandal of whether or not Obama was eligible - according to the U.S. Constitution - to become President of the United States! NOW WE KNOW WHY In an explosive interview by Dr. Laurie Roth on her syndicated West Coast radio show on August 7th, Douglas Hagmann - a respected journalist, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and longtime private investigator, and Judi McLeod, a prolific journalist and the managing editor of Canada Free Press - the reason for the media blackout about the birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to members of the media issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations but also from Federal Communication Commission officials! According to Hagmann and McLeod, who conducted a nine-month investigation and documented their findings scrupulously, after Obama was elected but before he was inaugurated:
During the interview, Hagmann and McLeod - who never mentioned a particular network by name - alluded to e-mails and other evidence in their possession, copies of which, they said, were secreted in several locations. But they did tantalize listeners with descriptions of meeting with "sources" outside of St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City, a high-placed contact looking nervously over his shoulder, references to directives and warnings given by "those at the top," and the undisguised threat of one executive to his underlings: "This is serious, and so will the consequences be if anyone chooses not to be a team player with this." This comes as no surprise to Fox watchers who have noticed that the Stalinist-style censorship of the Obama regime is already here. This couldn't possibly be because of the healthy shares of stock the Saudis bought in Fox, could it? If so, why would the Saudis care so much about quashing potentially damning revelations about Obama? Have they also bought shares in Obama? Come to think of it, who exactly paid the tuition for Obama's stint at Harvard Law School? What role did Obama's long-time friend, Khalid al-Mansour, a key advisor to a Saudi billionaire, play? Writer Kenneth Timmerman describes al-Mansour as "well known within the black community as a lawyer, an orthodox Muslim, a black nationalist, an author, an international deal-maker, an educator, and an outspoken enemy of Israel." This is not to omit that al-Mansour was originally contacted to intervene with Harvard on Obama's behalf by Percy Sutton, former Manhattan Borough President and the lawyer of Malcolm X. Ah...the tangled web of it all! Then there is the question of what role was played by Saudi Prince Alwaleed, the nephew of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia? You remember Prince Alwaleed, who offered then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani $10 million after September 11 if he would only blame America for the terrorist attacks of which 15 of 19 perpetrators were Saudi Arabian - a "gift" the mayor promptly and with appropriate contempt rejected! In short, what influence have the Saudis exerted on Fox to muzzle the issue of Obama's birth certificate? I don't ask this about the network TV channels or cable channels like CNN and MSNBC, which are still issuing daily hagiographies of Obama. TIP OF THE ICEBERG Just who has been sending "the message"? And how did it permeate not only the media, but also the once-respected U.S. Congress and the courts of our land, including the once-incorruptible Supreme Court? And what menacing forces made the once-courageous conservative media abandon their mission to expose rank corruption and collusion? Two words: Money Talks! If you're a media mogul and you get word from the FCC that your license will be pulled immediately and irrevocably if you mention only three words - Obama's birth certificate - poof! You send that word to your employees and tell them that their mega-salaries - in fact, their employment - are on the line. If you're a conservative talk-show host and you get your boss's directive not to dare to mention only three words - Obama's birth certificate - poof! Lips sealed; curiosity zero! If the money thing doesn't work, there's always the threat thing, i.e., "going public" about tax records, health status, or family secrets. Or be audited by the IRS. Or be investigated by any number of regulatory agencies. And if the money thing and the threat thing don't work, how about being reminded of all those "accidents" and "unfortunate incidents" - broken kneecaps, missing children, "falls" from buildings, punctured tires - that resulted not in joblessness or embarrassment but in death? We know that's how the Mafia works. It's also how political machines work. It's also how community organizers work. Wasn't it Obama himself who in 2008 said ''If They Bring a Knife...We Bring a Gun'' and in 2009 advised his followers to "Get in Their Faces!"? So determined are Obama's handlers to keep the facts of his parentage and place of birth out of the public domain that, as writer Chelsea Schilling has scrupulously documented, "the Federal Election Commission shows Obama's campaign has made regular payments to Perkins Coie since Jan. 1, 2007 - the month he formed a presidential exploratory committee and only weeks before he formally announced his candidacy for president - [and up to the present] - has paid Perkins Coie, a single law firm, $2.3 million...to crush eligibility lawsuits." But paying lawyers to quash the dozens of lawsuits that have challenged Obama's eligibility still doesn't answer the question of who exactly is behind the blanket blackout of the media, Congress and courts when it comes to Obama's origins, parentage, credentials, indeed identity. We certainly can't attribute this massive power play to Obama himself. After all, while "owning" the Congress and the media, he is failing miserably to gain support for his two signature pieces of legislation, cap & tax and healthcare "reform." No one that ineffectual - or, as Jonah Goldberg says, "astoundingly incompetent" - could possibly mute the media, castrate the Congress, and cow the courts. And we can't attribute the blackout to Obama's union and community organizing buddies. While the former are quite expert at threatening members to fall in line...or else, and the latter have mastered standing outside polling places with glowering facial expressions and menacing Billy clubs, neither has the heft to have compelled the media to roll over, the Congress to say they "know nothing," or the courts to load one side of the scales of justice with rocks and the other side with feathers. A COUP D'ÉTAT? Scholars and historians have documented exhaustively the Left's obsession with (1) the acquisition of power, and (2) transforming America from a free-market, Constitution-respecting, freedom-loving, God-embracing society into a Socialist-cum-Communist "share the wealth" collective that echoes the beliefs and "values" of their heroes Marx and Engels. But it takes money to bring about the kind of poverty both Socialism and Communism deliver to their masses. The kind of money only a few at the top enjoy while they'd like the rest of us to wait on food lines and appear before death panels of impersonal state functionaries who decide if we're worthy of antibiotics or surgery and, if not, convenient "go-to-sleep" pills. The kind of money that "talks" - that can buy people off, finance revolutions, launder money, pay to rig voting machines, manipulate allies into positions of power (czars, anyone?), conveniently crash markets (as George Soros did in England in 1992, Asia in 1997, and, I believe, the U.S. in September 2008), make people disappear, make birth certificates and other vital records disappear and then make sure that an entire media, Congress and court system is terrified of "going there." We all know of the many multimillionaires and billionaires - including Soros, the Saudi royal family, et al - who contributed to Obama's presidential campaign and continue to fund his leftist agenda, all of them with an ideological, religious, or personal stake in his remaining in power. And all of them part of a larger, more ubiquitous conspiracy - yes, conspiracy! - to conceal Obama's origins and true parentage. Among them, as JB Williams has documented, are "international socialists working through CPUSA - SPUSA and DSAUSA, funded by literally hundreds of leftist front-groups operating as special interest 527 organizations. Here's a short list of the BIGGEST leftist front groups: America Coming Together - Joint Victory Campaign 2004 - Media Fund - Service Employees International Union - American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees - MoveOn.org - New Democrat Network - Sierra Club - EMILY's List - AFL-CIO - League of Conservation Voters." Further, Williams asks: "Who spends an obscene $1-billion dollars to win a lousy $400,000-per-year job, and why?" Richard Poe, award-winning journalist and New York Times-bestselling author, has written extensively on Soros and makes a good case that the Hungarian-born Jew and self-admitted Nazi collaborator is the primary brains and money behind Obama - and, I believe, his healthcare travesty. When President Bush was in office, Poe wrote that Soros talked openly of a "regime change" in the United States. "What about our country offends Soros so deeply," Poe asked, "that he would tell the BBC - during a time of war - that he means to use all of his power to 'puncture the bubble of American supremacy'? Poe explained that Soros's Open Society Foundation, founded in 1984, "has spent millions promoting a radical agenda that includes abortion, feminism, gun control, abolition of capital punishment, voting rights for felons, drug legalization, euthanasia and gay marriage rights...the Soros cult preaches secularism, the godless faith of a world without nations, families, loyalty or tradition, a world in which the very words 'mother,' 'father,' 'husband,' 'wife,' 'son' and 'daughter' will be bleached of meaning forever." Soros, Poe continued, "is one of the world's leading promoters of euthanasia, or 'mercy killing.' Not only does he advocate 'physician-assisted suicide' for patients who choose death voluntarily, he also lobbies for the right of family members or court-appointed guardians to authorize the killing of patients whose wishes are not known." Sounds a lot like the Death Panels Sarah Palin warned about, doesn't it? Soros also founded the Project on Death in America [which] promotes suicide and euthanasia and urges doctors to warehouse terminally ill patients in hospices and give them 'palliative' care ...rather than wasting time, energy and money actually trying to cure them." Of course, all of these beliefs are eerily echoed in Obama's healthcare legislation, almost as if Soros had dictated the terms. Maybe he did! Maybe that was the price he exacted for financing a large part of Obama's presidential campaign and facilitating the cover-up of Obama's birth certificate and other documents. And maybe that's why Obama is still paying Soros back by recently announcing that he will invest $2 billion (or more) in drilling for oil off the shores of Brazil, where none other than George Soros owns $5.8 million of the Brazilian oil company's U.S.-traded preferred shares of stock! THE USUAL SUSPECTS While Soros may top the list of conspirators who have been trying to topple big bad capitalist America for decades, others figure prominently as well, including but not limited to: Noam Chomsky, Louis Farrakhan,,Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden, Jesse Jackson, Michael Moore, Cornel West, Ted Turner, former National Security Advisor to Pres. Jimmy Carter Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Rockefeller family, The Carnegie family, and, I might add, Fidel Castro and the cozy cabal of America-loathing Marxist revolutionaries he met with at the Theresa Hotel in Harlem. Then there are: The Congressional Progressive Caucus (their members here) aka the Democratic Socialists of America, formed by partners from the Communist Party USA and Socialist Party USA (Founder: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VA); The Congressional Black Caucus (their members here), originally established and controlled by the Communist Party USA (Founder: Cong. John Conyers (D-VT), and now controlled by ACORN and The Democratic Socialists of America; The ACLU, founded in 1917 by Communist Roger Baldwin; The Southern Poverty Law Center - a mini ACLU; The FORD Foundation; The Annenberg Foundation; The NAACP; The Council on Foreign Relations; The Trilateral Commission; numerous labor unions, and of course the mega-rich sheiks of Araby. While all of the above and many others have worked assiduously to dismantle America, there are probably only a relative handful of aiders and abettors who ushered the modern-day Trojan Horse Barack Obama into America's body politic and were sophisticated and connected and rich and arch enough to have facilitated his path to the U.S. Senate, sealed all of his records both home and abroad, assembled the massive organization for his run for the presidency, and delivered in only seven months the most radical leftwing - actually more Communist than Socialist - agenda in the history of the United States. WHO'S NOT CAVING ON THE BC ISSUE? McLeod and Hagmann have come very close to explaining a major piece of the conspiracy puzzle, specifically how some in the media were either bribed or threatened into silence vis-à-vis Obama's birth certificate. But the American people have a peculiar resistance to and revulsion for these thuggish tactics. In fact, the birth certificate issue has gained momentum. Why is it not going away but instead gathering steam?
As Obama's poll numbers continue to plunge, more and more people are waking up to his unique lack of qualifications and inability to lead the greatest nation in the world. As Kyle-Ann Shiver has written, "It's as though [in 2008] 59 million Americans joined hands and shouted at the top of their little lungs, 'Yes, We Can March off This Cliff.'" Writer James Lewis asks: "How do we fight Obama and his psychopathic lust for power?"...and answers: "You fight evil by exposing it."" ----------
Indeed, the American electorate has never been so energized, with millions upon millions of ordinary citizens - many of them seniors with vested interests in avoiding Obama's death panels - attending Tea Parties, Town Hall meetings, and writing and calling their representatives in massive numbers. In addition, people are now speaking openly about the man without a birth certificate. Who is this guy? What is he hiding? Why are media people studiously avoiding this issue? And why are those who "dare" raise it - like Lou Dobbs at CNN - being targeted by far-left groups, many of them funded by George Soros? Yet in spite of their efforts to conceal the truth about Obama's birth place and parentage, increasing numbers of articles, radio hosts and their callers and regular Americans have lost their amazingly forbearing patience and are now asking and will continue to ask until the question is answered: WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Trackback(0)
Comments (11)
  written by marshal, August 31, 2009
..I wish somebody had the balls to find out the truth?
 written by Jeanina, August 31, 2009
I'm from Peru and we had something similar with one of our Presidents Alberto Fujimori who claimed had born in Peru. There are records showing (pa*sort) that Fujimori parents brought him from Japan when he was almost 2 years old. Because of political pressure the case was never clear.
 written by Mary Mary Quite Contrare, September 01, 2009
Imagine a world where one man/ or woman rules, as king or leader whatever you want it called but everyone is at perfect peace with their own business of giving birth, raising healthy kids, working until the day we die, no money, no oil, no gold, nothing is bought or sold especially our souls, we all live according to our makers'
real purpose of mankond: we take care of our planet, waste not want not, eat less, loveourselves so much we care not for the ugliness that "sophisticated worldly fooforall trinkets(cars,drugs,alcohol,) Seriusly that will be what heaven has to offer, so in other words, like it or not, we are now experiencing a tasty piece of hell here on earth to guide the chosen few into walking the paths of mindpeace, not caring for fleshly lusts. p for pr pride L for lusts a for anger g for greed, u for usary e for envy s for strife. PLAGUES, what o not here in 2009 o no we are America China Russia Iran Iraq Europe canada Austrailia we are The Ultimate Unique Ugly humans! O may we build ugly concrete jungles that look like d**ned cemetaries (oops too late , humans and our kids are so weak we have to tear down destroy earth and make housing (which plenty of idiotas took huge mortages out and cry wolf about to get mo money mo money mo money. Shhh keep this one secret too, paper money is spreading germs, plastic money is wreaking havoc(none left at all, feds just pretending this whole world "house of cards "can remain afloat amidst the floods, earthquakes, abortions, baby killers, rapists, suicides, teachers raping students, bailouts on the backs of the tired downtrodden workers who still care to work real jobs.!!!???
 written by Steve Rogers, September 01, 2009
Good Article, I hope the internet can break up the old media power that has deceived the country for way to long.
 written by NONE OR THE ABOVE, September 01, 2009
The questions raised above may or may not prove valid but one fact is valid and is a good question. Why is the Certificate Number not showen on the so call "Certificate of Live Birth"? There is no way a document can be valid with out a tracable number on it.
I can't by help wonder if all the radical attempt to pa*s bills objected to by the public is not based on the truth of the facts and questions reaised in this article.
 written by BREAL, September 01, 2009
Hawaii has the long-form birth certificate. Obama refuses to release it.
WHY? BREAL
 written by rusane, September 02, 2009
First of all; the cable and main stream news media have covered the issue of Obama's Birth Certificate, extensively, and no reporters have died or lost their jobs as a result.
Here's what the media have uncovered; the original birth-certificate scanned and posted on-line for all to see, the COLB, two local newspapers announcing his birth in Hawaii, on-the-record statements from the Governor of Hawaii stating he was born in Hawaii, a bill pa*sed by the US House 378 to 0 stating he was born in Hawaii, recorded audio of his Grandmother saying he was born in Hawaii, letters to Kenyan relatives announcing his birth in Hawaii and on and on. You have a forged Republic of Kenya birth-certificate 'issued' before the Republic of Kenya existed (it was a british territory at the time) and a typo on a my-space page. Get real. "FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. "
 written by Ladysforest1, September 02, 2009
Listen rusane- The question has long since turned away from "was obama born in the US?". Simple fact is that he would have had dual citizenship at birth which would have made him constitutionally ineligible to be the president of this country. Many people know that now. But there are no documents regarding his history being made available to the citizens of this country even though there has been an increasing demand for transparency.
Are YOU happy that you brought a pig in a poke? Good for you. Be just as stubbornly blind and trusting as you want to be, just get out of the way. Let the rest of us get the answers that are owed to us by this man who has set himself up as president over our once great country. We all pay his salary, pay for him to run around the world and make us all ashamed to hear him apologize in the name of America. Get yourself way out of the way, and take your honey Nancy P. with you. The Born Identity Group is growing larger by the day, they will continue to demand answers even while the MSM cowers in submission. This man was never properly vetted, else this issue would never even be an issue. It is his duty to address this issue in a timely manner, yet he fights it ferociously. Why? Why? What does he gain by fighting? America DOES NOT have rulers. We have ELECTED officials that answer to the CITIZENS. Ask yourself one question, and do be honest with your answer, why DON'T you want him to make his records available? What are YOU afraid of?
written by rusane, September 03, 2009
Ok; I'm not going to get into an endless string of nonsensical debates here. This will likely be my last post. I'll check back and read your reply, but after that, I'm out - unless, of course, you say something enlightening.
Here goes nothing: Simple fact is that he would have had dual citizenship at birth which would have made him constitutionally ineligible to be the president of this country. Unfortunately that's not a 'simple fact', it's blatantly wrong. The constitution requires a person to be a natural born citizen to become president "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;". There are only two citizenship status in the US, natural born and naturalized. Being born in the US makes you a natural born citizen, even if your parents are non US citizens, and yes, even if some other country considers you a citizen also. This is not actually open for debate; it's been resolved by the supreme court (US vs Wong Kim Ark) "It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an amba*sador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born. III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established." We all pay his salary, pay for him to run around the world and make us all ashamed to hear him apologize in the name of America. I pay his salary to, as do all who elected him. As far as him 'making you ashamed'; that's a different subject, lets stay on topic. Get yourself way out of the way, and take your honey Nancy P. with you. Sorry, but I'm exercising my constitutionally protected right to be in the way (Article 1 of the Bill of Rights). Its easy to find; it's right above Article 2, which I suspect you are familiar with. It is his duty to address this issue in a timely manner... He did, the COLB was released in June 2008, in time for the election - which he won (most of us voted for him.) ...yet he fights it ferociously. Why? Why? What does he gain by fighting? He's not fighting you - he's ignoring you; because you represent a tiny minority of obstinate people who will never be satisfied no matter what further evidence he provides you with. Incidentally, it's also the reason I won't continue this debate after this post (afore mentioned exception excepted, of course). America DOES NOT have rulers. We have ELECTED officials that answer to the CITIZENS. Thats correct; including the current, duly elected 44th president of the United States. Ask yourself one question, and do be honest with your answer, why DON'T you want him to make his records available? What are YOU afraid of? Honestly? the records are available. I researched the subject and am satisfied with the conclusiveness of the evidence. As for fear, I'm not afraid; that would appear to be your domain.
 written by Joen, September 04, 2009 He did, the COLB was released in June 2008, in time for the election - which he won (most of us voted for him.) BALONEY!!!!! There is no 2007 COLB for Obama. It does not exist. The only thing anyone has ever seen -- including the two top administrators in Hawaii's DOH -- is a forgery. Both the Director of the DOH, Chiyome f*kino, and the State Registrar and Head of Vital Records, Alvin Onaka, said that they have seen Obama's original birth certificate, but they have REFUSED TO AUTHENTICATE THE COLB! The reason is so simple, a fifth grader would know the answer. They have no problem validating a real record that no one will ever get to see, but they do have a problem validating a forgery that everyone has already seen. Anyone who says that Obama's COLB is real is either completely nuts or lying through his teeth. Take your pick.
 written by Shambach, October 15, 2009
http://web.archive.org/web/200...060403.htm
The Sunday Standard in 2004 ran the story proudly: Sunday, June 27, 2004 Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations. so, he WAS born in Kenya...then... but by "consensus" NOW he "wasn't" born in Kenya but in Hawaii....? right- that 's why hell is reserved for coward, liars and traitors.... "oh yeah, I shouldn't call it lying... that's too accurate and doesn't sound fuzzy enough" ok, will trade the word lying for "concensus"...there is that more palatable?
Write comment
|
| Last Updated on Monday, 31 August 2009 07:02 |
Who Is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Login Form
Search the RSN Database of 7,000+ Articles
