The economic cost or loss involved has little or nothing to do with the outcome, as doing "something" to save Mankind from the destruction of our planet far outweighs doing "nothing".
It all sounds fantastic, but in fact it's just another ideological panacea to keep up the momentum that man is changing the Earth's climate to such an extent that unless the Human race do something now, we are all going to die. It's become another version of the Hans Christian Andersen's story "The Emperor's New Clothes
". The Emperor, or to use this analogy, the principal so called climate scientists, are on display to most of the main stream media, the media in turn misinform the public at large that the Emperor is looking great in his new clothes in spite of being totally naked. Naked being the description used for a complete lack of scientific evidence to support this label of scientific office.
Science has a history of fighting for the truth, just like good and evil, regretfully this is just another drawn out battle between the respective parties, who are involved to justify their aims and objectives. But now the story has taken an unexpected "twist", in that, you would have seen far less of an argument for the "Climate Realists" if it was not for the Sun being unexpectedly quiet during the past year and a half, and the implications of this are profound for each and every one of us, at last there is a voice in the crowd saying, why is the Emperor naked!
The "Climate Realist" have a well deserved lucky break, be it, we are moving out of one scenario and into another, or put another way, we could be jumping from the fictitious frying pan straight into a fridge!
The IPCC/UN models have failed so many times you would have thought good old "common sense" would have prevailed by now, in that, the "Man Made " theory does not work. The fact of the matter is, the media are supporting a spurious theory and in turn misleading the public at large, they even go to great lengths' to report the models are doing what they all expected them to do, I have even known them to say "cooling is a sure sign of warming"!
The Earth's history is very revealing on solar activity and our climate, less activity on the Sun results in "Global Cooling" and more activity results in "Global Warming". Somehow this simple rule of "thumb" has not made an appearance to those people directly involved with "Man Made Climate Change" (MMCC).
And here is the reason why.
In times of low solar activity the Earth has more "dust" in its atmosphere, the MMCC analysis show this as a spurious "coincidence". The principal climate scientists go on to say that volcanic "dust" was the reason behind times of "Global Cooling" and not the coincidental low solar activity.
This is what they say about the Dalton Minimum period from 1790 to 1839, during this time there was extra volcanic activity, and the dust from the eruptions reduced the effect of the Sun on the Earth.
At no stage was it put forward that the period of low solar activity was the "cause" of the Earth being more susceptible to tectonic plate movements. It's another example of the IPCC/UN showing the "Effect being the "Cause".
If you now accept that our climate is determined by the activity on the Sun, you must also accept that people can forecast the future from observed solar data rather then from the spurious analysis of "Man Made Climate Change".
I recently put this question of low solar activity and tectonic plate movement to Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn of WeatherAction
, who specialize in Solar wind forecasts, and use their models for climate predictions on the Earth weather system's, these show a very high accuracy in long range weather forecasts, and here is what he said....
"Think of a freight train moving, or being "active", the journey is fairly constant with not too many collisions between the separate carriages, but when the train is stationary or "non active" each carriage will collide as the train starts to move.
I can forgive anyone for not understanding this analogy for the first time, as it's the reverse of what you think. In that, a non active Sun affects the Earth more often, but why?
The answer to that is...
An "Active" Sun is a healthy Sun, in that, the frequency of "spots" indicates the patient has come through the illness and what you see on the surface of the Sun is just like what you would see after someone has had measles, the condition of the patient with spots is after the virus!
So, a "quiet" Sun is when you would expect to find far more magnetic disturbances on the Sun, and more tectonic plate movement on the Earth.
So, what does this all mean for the title of this news blog? It simply means that as we approach Solar Cycle 25 (appx 2019) the Earth will continue to gradually cool from is 1998 peak due to the lack of solar activity. As far as the "myth" of "Man Made Climate Change", the public at large will wake up to the realization of a "cooler" climate in a modern world, in so doing, they will probably disregard any information presented to them by the media that supported the "Man Made" myth.
The media have a responsibility to report to the public a balanced objectiveness, they also should voice skeptical points of view. We have come through a period in history that has shown this not to be the case; it's thanks to the World Wide Web that there is now a voice in the crowd.