| Constitutional Convention: Term Limits and Right to Referendum |
|
|
| Written by Fred |
| Thursday, 23 April 2009 15:16 |
|
April 23, 2009 Introduction The time has come to call a United States Constitutional Convention and vote on two amendments; Congressional Term Limits and the Citizen's Right to Referendum.
The first term limit amendment is long over due and will never be considered by those who have made a very lucrative career out of Congressional government service. Our founding fathers never envisioned a Congress exclusively run by these permanent lifelong political professionals who are indebted to those few special interests, which fund, sponsor, and keep them in power. No congressional term should exceed that which has been established for the President of the United States.
The second amendment provides for the right of US Citizens to referendum, administered by the states and infrastructure funded by the federal government with the acceptance of electronically verified petition signatures, and automated secret ballots. This amendment puts the power of government back into the people's hands, providing an overriding voice against the rising tide of legislative special interests and other influences coupled with a standardized, cost effective, efficient means to petition and vote. Our Founding Fathers stated it best;
"....WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness -- That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness....." Excerpt - Declaration of Independence - 1776 Historical Perspective Every government has a source of its sovereignty or authority, and most of the political structures of the U.S. government apply the doctrine of popular sovereignty. In previous centuries the source of sovereignty in some countries was the monarchy and the divine right of kings to rule. Americans place the source of authority in the people who, in a democratic society, reign. In this idea the citizens collectively represent the nation's authority. They then express that authority individually by voting to elect leaders to represent them in government. "I know no safe repository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves," wrote Thomas Jefferson in 1820, "and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion." 1 Technology, geography, time, and distance mandated the representative structure our Founding Fathers established. However, they were much attuned to potential change and future unforeseen problems. Had Thomas Jefferson lived today, and saw the power and speed of technology, communication, and exponential societal interaction, he and our Founding Fathers would be considering a few structural government modifications.
Recognizing that future eras would face different sets of issues, challenges, and priorities, the Founding Fathers created an amendment process by which the Constitution could be altered. Article V of the Constitution grants this right, stating: The founders offered two mechanisms for changing the Constitution. The first is for the proposed bill to pass both halves of the U.S. Congress (House and Senate) by a two-thirds majority in each. Once the bill has passed both houses, it then goes to the states. While the Constitution does not impose a time limit on states for which to consider the amendment, Congress frequently includes one (typically seven years).
In order to become an amendment, the bill must receive the approval of three-fourths of the states (38 states). This approval can be generated through either a state convention or a vote of the state legislature. In either case, a majority vote is necessary for passage. Often, the proposed amendment specifies the route which is necessary.
1) "United States Government," Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2009 The Problem The reason our Founding Fathers provided the Constitutional Convention mechanism was to address the very situation the American people find themselves in today. "Congressional representation based on special interests and self-serving political power." The US citizen's voice has been diminished and in many cases eliminated. The situation has created the following;
We need a US Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the state legislatures (34 states) sponsoring the following two key amendments that subsequently need to be approved by three-fourths of the states legislatures or conventions. 1) Congressional Term Limit Amendment Appendix I is a draft copy of the proposed amendment and clearly states; Section 1 "No person shall be elected to Congress more than twice, and no person who has held Congressional office or acted as a Congressional officer, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected to Congress shall be elected to Congress more than once. "But this Article shall not apply to any person holding a congressional office when this Article was ratified, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding a congressional office during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding that office during the remainder of such term. This amendment provides these key benefits;
Appendix II is a draft copy of the proposed amendment and has five important components; Section 1 "The right of citizens of the United States to referendum vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State." Section 2
(a) Referendum is the power of the electors to approve or reject federal statutes or parts of federal statutes.
(a) A referendum approved by a majority of votes thereon takes effect the day after the election unless the measure provides otherwise. If a referendum petition is filed against a part of a statute the remainder shall not be delayed from going into effect.
Section 4 Section 5 The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. This amendment provides these key benefits;
A key aspect to this solution is the electronic referendum and ballot infrastructure that many opponents will say is not possible. However, those in the Information Technology industry know that the banking industry has been using Authentication, Authorization and Non-Repudiation transactional security for over a quarter century and no one has been able to overcome the safeguards. The US has put a man on the moon and we should have no problems implementing the support infrastructure that allows for electronic signatures and secret ballots. Special Note- The issue of initiatives (See California constitution Article 2) has not been addressed since Congress should maintain the sole right to initiate and pass laws. The referendum amendment does not take this away but strengthens it by providing the people with an override and modification capability should Congress attempt to pass laws that dramatically impact the nation against the will of the very US Citizens they serve. Proposed Action The recent Tea Parties clearly identified a growing populace discontent with Congress and Government in general. A general lack of direction was palatable and this white paper is an attempt to act as a catalyst to address their issues. Only a Constitutional Convention that addresses Congressional Term Limits and Referendum will correct the obvious issues. The following actions are proposed;
2.The following State Legislatures must be lobbied to support a Constitutional Convention; California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Idaho, Utah, North Dakota, Arizona, Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia. 3.Every candidate should be publicly asked to support a Constitutional Convention in 2010 to adopt Term Limits and the Right to Referendum amendments. His or her failure to support this initiative should result in loss of constituent votes. 4.A web site should be established to promote the Constitutional Convention addressing Term Limits and the Right to Referendum. 5.The Constitutional Convention should be held July 4, 2010. 6.Tea Party Organizers and other civic groups should be contacted requesting support for a Constitutional Convention. 7.Political leaders and sponsors from all parties and affiliations should be sought. 8.This white paper should be communicated to as many US Citizens as possible via email, press release and news commentary. 9.Promotional and financial support for this initiative should be solicited from industry, grants, and political action committees. Document distribution, bumper stickers and other promotional materials should be generated.
Section 1
"No person shall be elected to Congress more than twice, and no person who has held Congressional office or acted as a Congressional officer, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected to Congress shall be elected to Congress more than once. "But this Article shall not apply to any person holding a congressional office when this Article was ratified, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding a congressional office during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding that office during the remainder of such term. Proposed Right to Referendum Constitutional Convention Amendment Section 1 "The right of citizens of the United States to referendum vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State." Section 2
(a) Referendum is the power of the electors to approve or reject federal statutes or parts of federal statutes. Section 3
(a) A referendum approved by a majority of votes thereon takes effect the day after the election unless the measure provides otherwise. If a referendum petition is filed against a part of a statute the remainder shall not be delayed from going into effect.
Section 4 Section 5 The Congress and States shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
-------------------------------------------- Trackback(0)
Comments (5)
![]() written by Bill Walker, April 24, 2009
For the author's information, the states have already applied for the two issues he describes in Article V convention applications. The author is incorrect as to his figures describing how many states have applied for an Article V convention.
The fact is all 50 states have submitted over 750 applications for an Article V Convention. These applications can be read at www.foavc.org. Thank you for your time. written by Joel Hirschhorn, April 24, 2009
As to the use of the Article V convention option to propose constitutional amendments, nearly everyone is terribly ignorant of all the facts. There have been over 750 applications from all 50 states for a convention, much more than the required 2/3, BUT Congress has refused to obey the Constitution. Learn all the facts at www.foavc.org and join the mission of Friends of the Article V Convention to make Congress obey the supreme law and give us the first Article V convention. Our nonpartisan group does not advocate for any specific amendments.
written by William A Holscher, April 25, 2009
My understanding that 34 states must ratify the same artlcle application for a Constitutional Convention to be held. The closest one is the Balance Budget Amendment and that is what I counted for my statistics. The arguement I have read concerns the States that have voted to ratify this Amendment (32 to date) with Ohio shelving the matter while 10 States recinded their prior votes.
The legal issue is whether those States that recinded their votes actually do count and as soon as the 34th State ratifies the Call for a Balance Budget amendment a Constitutional Convention can be called were any new amendments can be considered by a 3/4 state majority. I question your facts since 740 applications would have initiated a Supreme Court legal challenge against Congress by some organization or State. However, to my knowledge this has not been attempted. Why? written by Susan Stanton, August 31, 2009
Although I am very much behind the need for the aforementioned ammendments, now is not the time to hold such a convention. The previous con con (Constitutional Convention) was call to ammend the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution was created. The con con attendees could propose their own agenda and rules. With the current liberal administration, Congress, ACORN, Apollo Alliance, SEIU, etc., the convention could be packed, and the entire Constitution could be scrappped in favor of a centralized, socialist government. Be very careful of what you request.
Write comment
|
| Last Updated on Thursday, 23 April 2009 15:35 |
As to the two subjects he mentions. Both have already been asked for by the states as proposed amendments for the agenda of an Article V Convention.
The texts of the applications may be read at www.foavc.org. Thank you for you time.