| Chorus call for New World Order |
|
|
| Written by August Review |
| Friday, 09 January 2009 01:53 |
|
January 9, 2009
TC Members like Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Paul Volker and Brent Scowcroft, for instance. On January 5, 2009, Henry Kissinger was interviewed by CNBC on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. His voice still raspy and spoken with a thick accent, he responded to a question about President-elect Obama's first actions as President: "he can give new impetus to American foreign policy ... I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a 'new world order' can be created. It's a great opportunity. It isn't such a crisis."
And, of course it isn't -- for him. Kissinger has been patiently waiting since at least 1973 for his New World Order egg to hatch. And remember, in July 1971, Kissinger was the very first diplomat (under Nixon) to visit Communist China in order to open up trade relations with that brutal dictatorship. Oh, and that was an absolutely top-secret trip. The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 to create a "New International Economic Order." George H.W. Bush, also a Trilateral, later spoke of inaugurating a "New World Order." Hence, in Trilateral literature, the two terms have been synonymous ever since. (see The Trilateral Commission: Usurping Sovereignty)
Obama picked Trilateral Commission wonder boy Timothy Geithner to be Secretary of the Treasury. The rest of the team are protégés of Robert Rubin, also a Trilateral and former Treasury Secretary under Clinton. Obama's top foreign policy advisor has been Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller.
In 1974, Brzezinski stated, For the uninitiated, "six hundred people" refers to Congress: Replace it with a Socialist/Communist central coordinating organ.
On January 7, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said that "In the 21st century, there it is no longer a single nation who can say what we should do or what we should think." German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that the world "cannot continue as it is." Both Tony Blair and the current British PM Gordon Brown have repeatedly called for a New World Order for many years, but their cries are intensified. Interestingly, when President-elect Obama delivered a speech in 2008 to hundreds of thousands in Germany, he stated, Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen - a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world." The media hailed Obama for his vision of America and the New World Order.
Sampling of the global press
"What I'm saying is that a crisis is an event which can force democratic governments to make difficult decisions like those that will be required to create a North American Community," he said. "It's not that I want another 9/11 crisis, but having a crisis would force decisions that otherwise might not get made." So, now we have the mother of all crises and on a global scale at that: Financial, political, religious (remember Islam?). And socialistic solutions are being railroaded through on a daily basis. If the New World Order baby is about to be delivered, wouldn't you expect the fathers (Kissinger, Brzezinski, Scowcroft, Volker, Rockefeller, et al) to show up and pace the floor? Everybody figures that these guys are just crusty and harmless old men, but I will guarantee that when the baby is finally born the screaming will begin.
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)
![]() Write comment
|
| Last Updated on Friday, 09 January 2009 02:06 |
The called 'New world order' has already been here. However, it has been and will always be a failure.
Attempts will be made to reinvent it, but the outcome will be the same as the last.
Historical record:
After world war I, The first attempt was the 'League of nations'. After the Great war, it was the United Stated that invented it, U.S. President Wilson said that the League “would be a forum for the dispensation of justice for all men and wipe out the threat of war forever.â€
It failed, as it didn't halt the onset of WWII.
After WWII, The United Nations was formed, and its charter is “to maintain international peace and security.â€
Fail, as evidenced by the warfare, terrorism and general mayhem and cloak and dagger meddling being conducted worldwide by the same member nations.
The UN will be soon re-invented again
Historically, its re-invention is caused by certain triggers, such as world war. Today, we have world economic collapse.
However, as history has dictated, it will be the same as before because one important element for its success cannot be achieved; the member nations cannot agree to anything.
When one or several members of its body feel they're not getting their 'fair share', then everything that was planned and purposed will return to its ruins, and it will return to its toothless, ineffectual body of bickering fools.
So the question is, what arrangement or organization can bring true peace and security?