| United Nations power will grow under President Obama |
|
|
| Written by Vincent Gioia |
| Tuesday, 30 December 2008 13:24 |
December 29, 2008By Vincent Gioia Our incoming president has many plans that will drastically affect our country but few are more insidious and far reaching than his legislation to address "global poverty." Obama said "Eliminating global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges we face, with billions of people around the world forced to live on just dollars a day. We can - and must - make it a priority of our foreign policy ..." While in the senate our president-elect Barack Hussein Obama (it's ok to use his middle name now) joined with RINO U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) to introduce the Global Poverty Act (S.2433). The bill requires the President "to develop and implement a comprehensive policy to cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief" and coordination with the international community, businesses and NGOs. Representatives Adam Smith (D-WA) and RINO Spencer Bachus (R-AL) sponsored the House version of the bill (H.R. 1302), which passed the House in September. The Senate Subcommittee on Foreign Relations (where Sen. Joe Biden sits) approved this plan by a voice vote without any discussion! Why all the secrecy? If Senators Obama and Biden are so proud of this legislation, then why don't they bring it out into the light of day and let the American people have a look at it instead of hiding it behind closed doors and sneaking it through Congress for late night votes. According to Cliff Kinkaid of AIM, the plan passed the House "because most members didn't realize what was in it. Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require." Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP (currently about $65 billion a year) in addition to what the U.S. already donates overseas. The only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "Is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels." On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed. "This is disgusting, sickening and angers me to the depths of my soul," he wrote. "Obama wants us to support the world. I wonder how they intend to eliminate poverty. Most of the money always winds up in some dictator hands and in the U.N. coffers." The following summary is provided by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan government entity that serves Congress and is run by the Library of Congress. The summary is taken from the official website THOMAS. 4/24/2008--Reported to Senate amended. "Global Poverty Act of 2007 - Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015 ..." (emphasis added) More specifically, the Act would require the United States strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: "(1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs." Though the constitutional encroachment is not explicit in the proposed law, it is really a sneaky way for the United States to sign onto the United Nations Millennium Declaration and its goals which will have a drastic affect on our independence and freedom. The National Ledger defines the term "Millennium Development Goals" are the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2 (2000).[...]" In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, through adherence to the Millennium Development Goals, the declaration commits nations to banning "small arms and light weapons" and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. All these treaties involve seriously relinquishing sovereign, and in our case Constitutional, rights. Under the proposed law, the President is required to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to carry out that policy, include guidelines for what the strategy should comprise - from aid, trade, and debt relief, to working with the international community, businesses and NGOs to ensure environmental sustainability; requires that the President's strategy include specific and measurable goals, efforts to be undertaken, benchmarks, and timetables and; requires the President to report back to Congress on progress made in the implementation of the global poverty strategy. This legislation is supported by a broad range of the usual suspects including Bread for the World, CARE, Oxfam America, Habitat for Humanity International, National Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, United Church of Christ, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Borgen Project, United Methodist General Board of Church and Society, RESULTS, and Micah Challenge USA. Who can disagree with the idea of solving global poverty? However 'The Global Poverty Act' is actually a United Nation global tax that will be paid by American taxpayers. With large Democrat majorities in the house and senate there is a good chance a bill like The Global Poverty Act will be passed and signed by President Obama. The price tag of the bill is quite high; it would require the U.S. to increase our foreign aid by $65 BILLION per year, or $845 BILLION over the next 13 years! That's on top of the billions of dollars in foreign aid we already pay out. Nobody should be surprised at this likely additional debt; the amount of debt the country is already obligated for is absolutely staggering; it can never be re-paid. It is the result of years of incompetent self-serving legislators, failed and corrupt bank practices, loss of the manufacturing base and just plain greed. We cannot print the money fast enough and if additional global warming legislation is enacted, we may soon be burning it to stay warm. Obama's assault on the economy is perfectly timed to coincide with the American recession. Congratulations, Obama! Arab oil won't be taxed; nor will the Arab oil sheiks. The "obscenely over-rich and decadent capitalist economy" of the United States (in the words of domestic socialists) is the boundless treasure Obama wants to tap. Obama is so sensitive to Global Poverty that he forgot his grandma or his brother living in a mud huts in Kenya - as he relaxes in his largely donated (by accused grafter and Obama financier Antoin Rezko) mansion in Hyde Park But despite the huge financial cost to taxpayers, there are even worse ramifications of enacting this law. In addition to the economic burdens this potential law would place on our precarious economy, the bill would also endanger our constitutionally protected rights and freedoms by obligating us to meet certain United Nations mandates. These constitutional intrusions on U.S. sovereignty don't bother Obama; according to Obama, "We should establish these United Nations' goals as benchmarks for U.S. spending." The Millennium Declaration also affirms the U.N. as "the indispensable common house of the entire human family, through which we will seek to realize our universal aspirations for peace, cooperation and development." One example of the consequences of this program is that it has helped the Moldavians to write the world's first Muslim criminal code. It is one of the most comprehensive modern criminal codes in the world - modern Sharia Law is a better word. This law will have a "penal code" to coordinate with Sharia law and the Koran. The United Nations is currently considering similar wording in a declaration which would bind countries to not discriminate against Islam and make it a crime to do anything that disparages Islam, Muslims and the Koran. So far the United States has not signed onto the UN Millennium Declaration but passing something like Obama's Global Poverty Act will give tacit recognition to the aims of the United Nations as it seeks to expand influence over the countries of the world and provide a precedent for future accommodations to United Nation mandates. With President Obama in the White House who can say it will not happen? Vincent Gioia is a retired patent attorney living in Palm Desert, California. His articles may be read at http://www.vincentgioia.com/ and he may be contacted at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Trackback(0)
Comments (7)
![]() written by Ted, December 31, 2008
Challenge, can anyone prove this wrong?:–
1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizenâ€. 2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born. 3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen†(irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen†of USA) — as confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution agreed to by BHO. 4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 — between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) — to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President. 5. Since no facts are in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President. 6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President. 7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined — the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution. written by RichieRich, December 31, 2008 It is generally agreed that these constitutional provisions mean anyone born on American soil to parents who are U.S. citizens is a “natural born citizen†eligible to someday become president or vice-president Source; Lawrence Solum, Professor of Law and a*sociate Dean University of Illinois. every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.†Source; 1621 (March 24, 1866) (Rep. Myers); id. at 1629 (Rep. Roswell Hart); CONG. GLOBE, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 1291-92 (March 9, 1866) (Rep. Bingham); CONG. ... Make note: born to " Parents of ". The references to this are numerous. Barack Obama, Jr. if confirmed by the Electoral College would indeed be an illegal President. Democrats have been secretly trying to change this clause for decades. written by dg, December 31, 2008
I guess you'd rather he support Sun Myung Moon's personal UN. That organization works to mold the UN into Moon's desire just as his billions in overseas cash, front orginizations, his operatives and shills like the Bush family, Falwell, LaHaye and Viguerie have worked to mold the conservative movement we have in America today.
Uninformed? Read down here and start to learn who made you. Do you even know who has been the number one financier of the right in America over the last 30 years? http://tinyurl.com/5aodgn And you were told Soros was trying to "buy" the democratic party. hah written by Sa*syFra*sy, January 03, 2009
RIGHT NOW friend and foe here and overseas, want to subject the US MILITARY personnel to indictment and prosecution by the ICC.
tHE DEMS whom caused 911 by prior to 911 sending US law enforcers home empty handed when they went to YEMAN to arrest bin laden. This irresponsible actions allowed them to plan and commit 911 which happened after Bush got elected and brushed conffetti off his shirt. Then 1999 NY TIMES revealed that in a senate or congressional hearing that Clinton admitted it was he and ACORN faulty lending practices that would/did bring meltdown. GERMANY AND ITALY have actually already indicted US CIA agents for supposedly capturing radical islamic terriorists. This is an infringement on our SOVEREIGNTY and a dagger aimed at our US MILITARY. As a result, they may soon want to charge our troops overseas whom are fighting against terriorism, with trumped up "war crime" charges. Charges like claiming Americans committed genocide, or claim we committed crimes against humanity. There's a leftist group in Paris, plus Argentina, Sweden, whom want to charge Rumsfeld for allegedly authorizing torture at Guantanamo bay, and abu Graib prison in Iraq claiming 1984 convention against torture, which FRANCE has used in previous torture cases. it's really time to put the UN on notice that the days where the USA would mindlessly supply it with money, men, military equipment and blood without conditions are simply over. In fact the latest---the new UN SEC GENERAL has already stipulated he wants NYC police officers to serve in UN peacekeeping mission in places like haiti, kosovo, and liberia. here is one more reason why CLINTON IN 2000 gave his blessing to the whole globalist thing on the UN "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC). The DEMOCRATS all along want to make US citizens SERVANTS TO THE UN AS OUR GOVERNMENT instead of a country governed by WE THE PEOPLE. Thankfully Bush saw the serious theat this Socialist star chamber posed to our military and he told them to stuff a sock in it. Apparantly at that time the UN was insulted by it. Although the REPUBLICANS tried twice to negotiate immunity for US peacekeepers thru the Sec Council. Well, the anti-Americans at the UN wouldn't have any of it and the Abu Graib prison gave Kofi Annan the opening he wanted. The he tried to wrap himself in the human right mantle by claiming it would be unfotunate for someone to press for such an exemption given the prisoner abuse in Iraq. We all know that if Mr. Amman really cared a "thing" about human rights he would have protested the revolving membership of certain countries with human rights track records. However, the Sanctimonious UN and Annan are always silent on the topic of human rights; except when it comes to taking cheap shots at the US h written by Sa*syFra*sy, January 03, 2009
What they are really after is for the US to submit to the will of the UN and it's International criminal court. What they want is for the US to relinquish it's SOVEREIGNTY relagating WE THE PEOPLE of the US to the status of servants to the UN INSTEAD of being governed by WE THE PEOPLE
THIS would for example entail that any US citizen or US military can be abducted and US servicemen serving in let's say Pakistan could be apprehended by local Muslim authorities for an offense, real or imagined slammed into the ICC and flown to the Hage, netherlands where they would rot for months waiting for trial and done ENTIRELY without due process. they would get not trial and no confronting of accusers, No protection from double jeopardy and no unanimous verdict for a conviction. Take a second to THINK about this all of the globalists within and without the USA think the murderous Al Qaida terriorists should have these rights HOWEVER NOT OUR US SOLDIERS and NOT US CITIZENS. Even though we can't guarantee that no American soldier is ever taken prisoner by a foreign state and put before the ICC, we at "least" make sure no US soldier and or civilian meets with this fate. However, the ICC doesn't want to recognize the CONSTITUTIONAL rights that we as Americans are guaranteed. GET IT?? They too think our constitution is FLAWED. Meanwhile the globalists Anti-American ICC supporters criticized Mr. Bush claiming we were "undermining international LAW, the reality, THEY were writing new INTERNATIONAL LAWS TO protect themselves. Want to know WHAT were the "agreement on the Privileges and immunities of the ICC" ratified with the a*sent of ONLY 10 NATION--it flat out provides the ICC immunity from "every form of legal process anywhere". They stated that the "property, funds, and a*sets" of the ICC "shall be IMMUNE from search, seizure, requisition, confiscation, expropriation and any other form of interference. And, the ICC and it's a*sets they said "are to be exempt from all direct taxes" including local taxes and customs. Long and short of it----the ICC MEMBERS have declared themselves IMMUNE form "personal arrest or detention, Legal process of every kind and immigration restrictions. Oh then then lastly, the "salaries, emoluments and allowances" of the judges prosecutor deputy prosecutor and the registras of the ICC ARE EXEMPT from taxaition. What hypocrites, it seems to run really, really DEEP in the UN, but it indicates the lengths to which globalists will go to undermine National SOVEREIGNTY. There's no mistaking it, the ICC SEVERELY undermines our Sovereignty and has over the years placed our troops at great risk. It CLAIMS complete jurisdiction over every person in the world and it makes no difference to them whether or not that nation has even ratified the treaty. And, FRANKLY our own constitution may soon be up to the interpretation of 18 foreign -and for the most part hostile-ICC JUDGES. Long and short of it, the ICC is literally a dagger in the heart of our US SOVEREIGNTY, our freedom and our independence. written by Sa*syFra*sy, January 03, 2009
Oh, but here’s one more—According to the SHARIA LAW Koran–the Non-muslims because they are NON-muslims are required to pay a tax anytime the muslims require it to keep the Non-muslims from being killed. Also, to keep the muslims living in the “lifestyle†that they want to be “accustomed†to live in at the expense of all NON-muslims in USA and in the world.
For those whom in America have yet to realize it—the SHARIA LAW movement is a communist/facist/socialist/marxist movement—looking to create another holocaust–Only this “time†it won’t be just the jews it would be any Non-muslim in existence. In other words “same†hitler terroist horse, just another “brand†name label. Write comment
|
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 December 2008 14:00 |
Foreign Aid is a good idea. It promotes the American idea, creates economies, good health, education in the " right hands ". Make note, I said in the " right hands ". Look what $580 billion dollars a year has done to our public education in the wrong hands. Face it, the American public school graduate isn't the sharpest tool in a blow up moon walk.
I'm all for increasing Foreign Aid as long as it isn't via the America hater United Nations. We can handle this directly and should do so. What does the United Nations do with our money. In 2007 our contribution to the United Nations was I think $1.3 billion dollars in which in return we got what?. Choice seats for the buffet line. Muammar Qadhafi head of human rights. Hey, maybe they can find room for outgoing Governor Blagojevich. He can head up the next " bleep, bleep, bleep " oil for food program.
Maybe it's time we send the United Nations packing it's bags. When we need to communicate with the rest of the world we can pull out our iPods.