• Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

Right Side News

Wednesday
Jan 07th
Home arrow Editorial arrow Generous With Other People's Money
Generous With Other People's Money PDF Print E-mail
Sunday, November 30, 2008
by Thomas E. Brewton

Liberal-progressives presume that they can do no wrong, so long as they take other people's money for the benefit of the secular and socialistic welfare state. Citicorp's Robert Rubin is getting harsh words from investors who ask why he should receive $115 million in annual compensation, while shrugging off any suggestion of personal responsibility for the banking giant's horrendously imprudent investment policies. 

Mr. Rubin says that he was merely a broad-gauge policy advisor, that problems arose from the policies he supported only because of poor execution by underlings.

In the same vein, liberal-progressives steadfastly maintain that socialist welfare-state policies always fail only because the government didn't spend enough money, long enough.

Like New Jersey governor Jon Corzine, his liberal-progressive, former Goldman Sachs colleague, Mr. Rubin, the Clinton administration's Secretary of the Treasury, apparently believes that liberal-progressives can do no wrong, because they know what is best for you and me.  What is best in their judgment is confiscating our earnings and redistributing them to favored special-interest groups in the name of social justice. 

Redistributing wealth, in the dogma of the socialist religion, is a step in the direction of eliminating private property ownership.  That mythology, elaborated in Jean Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract, instructs us that original sin was the advent of private property, which changed human nature and introduced greed, crime, and warfare to society.

In the Judeo-Christian tradition, original sin was Adam and Eve's eating fruit of the tree of knowledge, seeking to become God's equal in knowledge and power.  Christians and religious Jews are schooled to eschew preoccupation with self and to seek ways to help others, while prayerfully acknowledging that all their blessings come, not from themselves or the secular political state, but from God.

In contrast, liberal-progressives like Messrs. Rubin and Corzine assume that they have successfully eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge (the modern gnosticism of socialism) and are therefore wise and powerful enough to play God here on earth. 

Just as in Mr. Rubin's failure to take responsibility for disaster on his watch at Citicorp, liberal-progressive Republicans and Democrat/Socialists repeatedly raise taxes to confiscatory levels, and expand the nanny state with deficit financing, heedless of the destructive effects on public morality and financial stability. 

Liberal-progressivism's welfare state encourages self-centered, special-interest greed, evidenced currently in the public's unwillingness to reduce government spending in the face of approaching bankruptcy at state and Federal levels.

Ironically, the Federal Reserve's massive over-expansion of the money supply to finance deficit spending, the be-all and end-all of liberal-progressive policy, is the root cause of the financial system disaster in which Citicorp played a major part.  Mr. Rubin, we may suppose, sees no connection between his advocacy of imprudent policies in the Federal government and their fostering greed at Citicorp.
 --------------------------------

Thomas E. Brewton is a staff writer for the New Media Alliance, Inc. The New Media Alliance is a non-profit (501c3) national coalition of writers, journalists and grass-roots media outlets.

His weblog is THE VIEW FROM 1776
http://www.thomasbrewton.com/

Email comments to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Sphere: Related Content
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)Add Comment
Redistribution and Original Sin
written by Robert Jacobs, December 02, 2008
I would add that the socialist religion insists that the State has the right to appropriate private property for its own purposes. Socialist dogma insists that the State acts, by definition, only to the benefit of the people. Socialists, of course, in order to benefit the people, select their own pet projects beliefs and institutions (and therefore friends) first, in order to benefit the people (second). This is because they know what is GOOD and BAD, what is RIGHT and WRONG and are likewise certain that those who oppose them mistake BAD for GOOD and WRONG for RIGHT.

This gets to the religious basis for morals. Scripture makes clear that the forbidden fruit was the knowledge of GOOD and EVIL, not the fruit of knowledge, per se. Moral values confuse and cloud decision making, resulting in the concepts of GOOD and BAD interfering with the knowledge of true and false. Scripture also makes it clear that MAN was created with knowledge and given stewardship of the world. It is when he mixes up this knowledge of true and false with concepts of GOOD and EVIL that he errs and takes the wrong actions (Ref: Maimonides - Guide for the Perplexed).

This is why Socialism is so dangerous, as it not only posits that the GOOD of all outweighs the good of the individual, but that some force (power, government, etc.) has the right and obligation to decide and enforce what is GOOD (nor fair, proper or even-handed, but RIGHT/GOOD) upon the people. After all, Socialists know what is GOOD and BAD, what is RIGHT and WRONG. Religion and scripture just get in their way.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Free Newsletter



Bookmark and Share
feed image
tyrannyofnicejpg.jpg
Lost Password? No account yet? Register