| Who Will Defend Free Markets? |
|
|
|
|
October 6, 2008 The Heritage Foundation If you thought passage of last week's $700 billion Wall Street bailout meant Congress would get out of Washington, you're not that lucky. Determined to pin the credit crunch on free markets, Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) has announced a whole month's worth of hearings in the House Oversight and Government Reform on the "financial meltdown." For Waxman and his fellow travelers on the left, the past two weeks mark the collapse of capitalism due to deregulation . Nothing could be further from the truth. First of all, by every quantifiable measure, regulation has increased under President Bush:
In total, the federal government imposes a nearly $1.1 trillion regulatory burden on the American people every year. Many of these regulations are justified. Providing transparency and creating information are value-added government functions. Regulation is not per se inconsistent with market principles. Some reinforce property rights and market mechanisms. But creating a massive government duopoly in the residential real estate market does not reinforce market mechanisms. It perverts them, and it perverts them to such a degree that some estimate that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae purchased more than a third of the $3 trillion in junk mortgages created during the housing bubble. They did so because heavy government regulation required them to push as much money into questionable mortgage buyers as possible. As Ronald Reagan said in his 1981 inaugural address: "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." The free market needs defenders like Reagan now more than ever. As Washington Post columnist Sebastian Mallaby writes today:
The American people still believe in this message. According to Rasmussen Reports, 59% of Americans agree with Reagan's verdict that government is the problem. But that does not mean we should abolish government; just keep it limited to a smaller role. In that same address, Reagan also said: "Now, so there will be no misunderstanding, it's not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; to stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it." QUICK HITS
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 125 Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
Sphere: Related Content |
|
cash for structured settlements 8mm transfer Photoluminescent Exit Signs - These signs use a number of chemically treated layers in tandem to create constant light that will last for years at a time. Plano Divorce Lawyer credit repair company Dealing With Difficult Employees |