Written by Vinod K. Dar
Climatology is a science. Climatism is an ideology. Climatologists are scientists. Climatists are social or political organizers who abuse climatology in the service of ideologues. Climatology was and still is an investigation of nature. Climatism is the exploitation of the fear of nature to gain power, wealth and social esteem.
Once, learned discussions about the climate, if not tomorrow's weather, were confined to climatologists. Today, public discussion about the climate in the Western media is dominated, maybe monopolized by climatists. The typical American, Canadian, European, Japanese, or Australian is exposed to climatism daily but hardly ever to climatology. Climatism is a Western ideology that has, generally, failed to expand its ambit of influence beyond rich people in rich countries.
Climatism asserts that severe or catastrophic changes in the climate are ahead (but not just yet). The primary strain of climatism and the one known to the general public is that the earth is warming rapidly (Climatism W). This is a terrible thing. Human beings acting according to their nature i.e engaging in human activity are responsible. However, climatism has the solution: ruthless carbon suppression via total control of human society, globally. The secondary strain but one unknown to the public is that the earth is getting ready to cool dramatically (Climatism C). This is a terrible but entirely natural thing. Human beings have nothing to do with it and there will be few left anyway, assuming they follow some survival prescriptions, to worry about such things.
As CS Lewis wrote about the historicism and scientism plaguing his own generation these ‘isms' are "the sweet poison of the false infinitive." His contemporary, Ronald Knox, pondering the same ‘isms' wrote" The world's future occupied their thoughts instead of a future world, and, by a kind of inverted Confucianism they fell to worshipping their grandchildren." To both Lewis and Knox the ‘isms' tempt people to live in the future, instead of the present which is our reality, because the future engenders both fear and hope ,which can be exploited.
Climatists take a small, verifiable, truth and expand it to cover an enormous sphere of nature and human activity. They invoke the authority of science and the mystery of scientific nomenclature to bludgeon the public. Climatists are always certain. Climatologists readily admit their uncertainty. Climatists force fit every event, observation or trend no matter how contradictory or palpably irrelevant to "prove" their superiority: from penguins to polar bears, to deluges and droughts, changing deserts and rainforests, expanding and retreating glaciers, thickening and thinning ice sheets, coral reefs and noctilucent clouds( clouds high above the surface of the earth made of chemical ice that shine like brilliant gems at night), volcanoes and typhoons, solar wind and water vapor, and of course, very small changes in the carbon dioxide composition of the atmosphere. Climatologists concede there is much they cannot fit or explain, much less predict.
Climatism W has, until recently, succeeded in capturing the political imagination of the West and international bureaucrats paid and flattered by the West and the full range of the energy and environmental agenda in the West. It has failed to do so in the rest of the world, particularly the Global South. In the public climate discussion climatologists have been the silent majority. This appears to be changing as more climate scientists in both the West and the rest of the world (especially Russia and India) challenge Climatism W. While politically Climatism W remains potent it may have peaked this year and possibly is waning. In the Global South it has been defeated as an ideology though still regnant as a convenient slogan. In the West its actionable victories have so far been minor although much trumpeted. Time is no longer on the side of Climatism W. It must either succeed in the next 2 years or not at all. Since Climatism C is not a political program its ideological success or failure is of no political or public policy consequence.
Climatism W has a tremendous advantage: it has learned very well the insights of the various collectivist and materialist ‘isms' of the 20th Century: scientific reductionism, communism, fascism, socialism and indeed even racism. It has absorbed and expertly applied the insights to the circumstances of the early 21st Century and displayed mastery of propaganda and mass political communications. Climatism W's program is simple and effective: first exploit a deep fear among the general public. If the fear is not initially prevalent, then manufacture it since, in the 21st Century, urban Western civilization is far more impressed with manufactured or synthetic reality than with truth. Second, offer to take away this fear in return for great power, money and stature.
As the prospects for successfully implementing the program diminish, vast temper tantrums, fantastic accusations and staggering lies will be deployed to intimidate voters and politicians into submission. Screaming often works.
The 20th Century ‘isms' realized that there were four ways for people to know things: by reasoning, by experience, by revelation and by authority. If reasoning, experience and revelation can be eliminated or discredited as channels then only authority remains and authority can be seized via assertion, repetition and bullying.
The lay person cannot reason about the global climate. The time, effort and intellectual preparation are simply not available to 99% of the population. Reason, as a source of knowledge is eliminated. Modern urban Western people have no experience of nature as a diversified, cyclical, hierarchical whole. The modern Western man or woman has no ability to "read" nature and nature's many signs and indicators and connections. People cannot directly experience the signals nature provides about whether the global climate is warming, cooling or varying gently and rhythmically. Experience is eliminated as a source of knowledge. Revelation is just available to the materialistic and reductionist mind of the 21st Century Western man or woman.
This leaves authority as the sole source of knowledge. Authority, for many in the West, resides in black boxes that are opaque, complicated, mathematical models which purport to yield information about the future. The outputs of these models, which are pervasive, are used almost daily by most people. These are quantitative models about next week's weather; the stock, credit, commodities and housing markets; the economy, population, crime, politics, cities, diseases, games, the cosmos; in fact, anything one is remotely interested in. Models are the manufactured reality of our age. They are the goat entrails of the 21st Century. Just as selecting the right goat to kill and reading the entrails was the province of the highly select and self anointed, so too with models. People obsessively want to know the future and models are the channels to next month, next year, the next decade and indeed the next three to four decades.
Western society and societies that ape Western sophistication and sophistry are perhaps the most credulous in human history. Many of us will believe practically anything somebody with assurance says if they flourish a mathematical model, inaccessible data, and can cite ten other people as validating sources. Naturally, the model makers and keepers are vested with awesome authority. Climatists W claim to have the models that portend terrifying consequences from global warming caused by human activity. Fear of the climate, has for many people in the West, become the abiding fear of our time.
Terrors go away when people confront them or if, after repeated predictions of imminent doom, the end does not come. It is the task of climatologists and interested lay people to confront the terror long enough and expose the expression "Carbon control now" as grammatolatry so that Climatism W's predictions fail. Then, Climatism W will be defeated. Otherwise it will win.
The quotation at the beginning of this essay was taken from a letter by Pope Gregory the Great to Ethelbert, King of the Angles (June 601). Gregory was one of the most talented, learned and accomplished men of the Middle Ages. If even one as able as he could be wrong, then why should we believe any climatist today?
Vinod K. Dar writes for Right Side News and is an energy industry professional and has published articles for electric and gas industry journals and trade press for more than 25 years. He is the Managing Director of DAR & COMPANY, founded in 1990. He has operating experience in gas and electric trading, marketing, retailing and merchant generation, and has been CEO of two energy trading and marketing companies. Mr Dar has served on the Boards of five publicly traded energy and consulting firms.