Global Terrorism
Geert Wilder's Anti-Islam Movie | Geert Wilder's Anti-Islam Movie |
|
March 29, 2008 After few refusals of TV stations and websites to broadcast Geert Wilders' anti-Islam movie 'Fitna', and attempts behind the scenes, encouraged by USA and Holland administration, to prevent wide publication of the disputed footage, Fitna was posted in few web sites on 03/27/2008. The film sharply criticizes the Islam of nowadays as a brutal threat to the world and ends with the words "defend your freedom". Fitna in Arabic means a combination of social chaos, anarchy and civil war. Geert Wilders is a Dutch PM who began his political carrier as a speech-writer for the liberal VVD party in Holland. Ayaan Hirsi Ali was a PM on behalf of the liberal VVD party, before she was eventually forced to flee Holland when the Dutch government failed to protect her after she produced, with the film director Theo van Gogh , a short movie that dealt with violence against women in Islamic societies. Theo van Gogh himself was assassinated by a fanatic Muslim on 11/02/2004. Following Theo van Gogh’s murder, Geert Wilders set up his Freedom Party (PVV), attracting later widespread political support for his call for a ban on the burqa - which covers most of the body - even though the measure would have affected only around 50 women. In 2006 elections his Freedom Party picked 9 seats in the Dutch parliament. The Fitna movie challenges the boundaries of freedom of speech in Europe versus the attempt of Islamists in Europe and the world to exclude the debate about Islamic society. According to Islamists the subject of the Islamic society as in the case of Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s movie, or about the Prophet Muhammad as in the case of Muhammad Cartoons in Denmark, and about the Islam as a religion in the latest Fitna footage, should be banned from any public debate as they consider it an insult to Islam.
Fitna footage is a part of the Cultural Conflict between Western Democracies and the Global Jihad. Film is availabe for viewing on Right Side News. Comments (4)
![]() written by Marie Jon', March 29, 2008 Hi There, The fact that you make such bold and inflammatory statements, are so telling about you and your religious beliefs. "Privately many Muslim leaders or Imams are gleaming with joy for the reaction that such provocative moves have caused and many of them cannot remember any thing like it. They wonder whether is it a rekindled love or dormant emotions or feelings that have been awakened." Need anyone say more? There will come a time when the USA will need to become much more selective who is invited a say in our country. Encroaching Demands From A Religion Of Peace" I believe the enclave in Dearborn Michigan is a great place to start looking for those need to depart from our homeland. Find peace, joy and love in a loving Savior. He came to give your life a new re-creative beginning. The Second Coming Belongs To God alone, Not a Twelfth Geet Wilders Speaks: Anti-Koran Film ( Part 1 of 2) report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
written by Peter, March 29, 2008
Mohamed, your comment is a nice piece of writing, but it rambles a bit. I am trying to figure out if you are criticizing the the film, or are merely reinforcing it's message. It would be great if we could all get along and respect each other's differences, but it is quite clear that a group of Muslims have been attacking people like me for many years. I find this offensive. I also find it offensive that a group who bases their spiritual foundation on destruction and conquest through violence would want to force me to join them, or cut off my head in the process. Your post makes me think you really meant to say, "resistance is futile." We'll see about that.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
written by Mohamed, March 29, 2008
The North Wind was trying to demonstrate its stronger power over that of the sun by blowing so hard to make a man wearing a coat to take it off. Instead of removing his coat the man held tightly onto it. When the sun had its turn it just had to send warmth to make that man willingly take off his coat. From Aesop's fables.
With the republishing of the so called "Mohammed cartoons" most Muslim websites and newspapers now exhibit signs displaying "except Mohamed" urging visitors and readers to boycott all Danish products. This public campaign has worked to the extent of making people detest any Danish product. Privately many Muslim leaders or Imams are gleaming with joy for the reaction that such provocative moves have caused and many of them can not remember any thing like it. They wonder whether is it a rekindled love or dormant emotions or feelings that have been awakened. These Imams have never seen such a show of love by the masses for prophet Mohamed, and now the stage is set for the anti-Koran film which perhaps would also reignite the interest in reciting the Quran. At the end of the day if these provocations turn out to be counter productive, should Muslims be thankful ? Certainly but not to Jyllands Posten or Geert Wilders. Instead they should be thankful to Allah who put at their disposal such an arrogant and ignorant enemy whose actions only served to strengthen their beliefs. Denmark has chosen to embrace the role of the whipping boy to whom all angry emotions are vented and Denmark is probably taking over the USA in one area, the country which has its flag suffer most frequent flag desecration or burning. So the previously respected Danish flag is now being widely used as a floor mat. Denmark followed by the Netherlands have chosen to be the football players who score the auto goal, or the soldiers who carry the guns that backfire. While Muslims are not happy with such provocations and do not appreciate these actions they are certainly grateful for the result. So why shall they pray for the replacement of conveniently placed players or soldiers? Obviously the source of these irresponsible provocations is not the cunning British or the sly French but rather they originated from the land from where the north wind blows or the land of the blond which proves that blond stupidity does have certain merits. Shakespeare was thoughtful in saying: "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" But why did the Danes or the Dutch choose this time? Probably it is just miscalculation on their part. They may have thought that this is the best time to defeat Islam morally as it has so far resisted all attacks militarily. A similar situation where attacks have backfired was mentioned in the Quran in the chapter of light or "Sura Noor". There is a verse that refers to an incident when Aisha the wife of prophet Mohamed was accused of adultery. The verse says: "Those who have brought forth the false accusation were a group from within you. Do not think it is bad for you, for it is good for you. Every person amongst them will have what he deserves of the sin. And as for he who had the greatest portion of it, he will have a great retribution." This systematic attack on Islam has so far been directed towards the most sacred person in Islam; the prophet Mohamed and to the most sacred book the Quran. We should expect the next attack to be directed towards Makkah (Mecca ) the most sacred place for Muslims, where the Saudis would not welcome that attack publicly but privately would love to see millions of Muslims flock to Makkah exactly as the man wearing the coat was holding it tightly as the north wind blows stronger. One can not help but ask the question: What have the Danes or the Dutch gained from all of this? And have they ran out of other ideas to demonstrate the right for free press? Mohamed Alkilani Benghazi Libya report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -3
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
Dear Mohamed Alkilani ,
Google.com the op-ed--The Second Coming Belongs To God alone, Not a Twelfth Imam By Marie Jon'
Encroaching Demands From A Religion Of Peace" --and YouTube.... Geet Wilders Speaks: Anti-Koran Film ( Part 1 and 2)